Actualizing AI Affordances in ELT Practicum: Mediating Factors in Pre-Service Teachers’ Pedagogical Use
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22515/elereviews.v6i1.14446Keywords:
artificial intelligence, affordance theory, ELT, pre-service teachers, teaching practicumAbstract
The rapid adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) in English language teaching (ELT) has prompted growing interest in its pedagogical potential. However, existing studies on AI in ELT have largely focused on teachers’ perceptions of AI benefits and challenges, with limited attention to the mechanisms through which AI affordances are actualized in authentic teaching practicum contexts. Grounded in affordance theory, this qualitative case study investigates how and under what conditions pre-service English teachers actualize AI affordances during teaching practicum. Data were collected through a questionnaire (n = 30) and in-depth semi-structured interviews with three purposively selected pre-service teachers. Thematic analysis revealed that AI’s enabling affordances were actualized when pre-service teachers critically evaluated and adapted AI-generated outputs through pedagogical knowledge, content knowledge, ease of use, and prompt literacy. Conversely, limitations in pedagogical knowledge, particularly in articulating pedagogical intent through prompts and ethical uncertainty, constrained the actualization of AI’s enabling affordances. The findings suggest that AI’s pedagogical value does not reside in the technology itself but emerges through teachers’ situated perceptions, knowledge, and actions. This study highlights the importance of explicit pedagogical guidance in teacher education to support meaningful AI integration.
Downloads
References
Beach, R. (1993). A teacher’s introduction to reader-response theories. National Council of Teachers of English.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Butler, Y. G., & Jiang, S. (2025). How do pre-service language teachers perceive generative AIs’ affordance?: A case of ChatGPT. System, 129. 103606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2025.103606
Chen, Q., Tawilapakul, U., & Lin, A. M. Y. (2026). Teacherness in the age of GenAI: An ethnographic exploration of pedagogical decision-making and AI integration in English language teaching. System, 136. 103877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2025.103877
Conole, G., & Dyke, M. (2004). What are the affordances of information and communication technologies? Research in Learning Technology, 12(2), 113-124. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v12i2.11246
Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2024). The educational affordances and challenges of ChatGPT: State of the field. TechTrends, 68(2), 380-392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-024-00939-0
Dai, K., & Liu, Q. (2024). Leveraging artificial intelligence (AI) in English as a foreign language (EFL) classes: Challenges and opportunities in the spotlight. Computers in Human Behavior, 159. 108354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108354
Dittrich, L., Aagaard, T., & Hjukse, H. (2022). The perceived affordances of simulation-based learning: Online student teachers’ perspectives. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19, 60. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00366-2
Eedelouei, S. (2026). Factors influencing language teachers’ judgements and decision-making about the use of generative AI tools: A systematic review. In Teaching and Teacher Education, 171, 105333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2025.105333
Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect, 42(3), 255-284. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551
Forkosh-Baruch, A., Phillips, M., & Smits, A. (2021). Reconsidering teachers’ pedagogical reasoning and decision making for technology integration as an agenda for policy, practice and research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69, 2209-2224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-09966-7
Ismaniati, C., Khairaty, N. I., Yusuf, N., & Supramono, A. (2025). Harnessing self-efficacy: Mediating the connection between TPACK and AI intentions among teachers. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 9(2), 109-126. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202531937
Jeon, J. (2024). Exploring AI chatbot affordances in the EFL classroom: Young learners’ experiences and perspectives. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 37(1-2), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.2021241
Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(4), 63-85. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02300500
Khojasteh, L., Shokrpour, N., & Moslehi, S. (2025). Decision-making in decoding AI-generated content: Emotional dynamics and pedagogical strategies in English for specific purposes education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 157. 104952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2025.104952
Klein, G. (2008). Naturalistic decision making. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 50(3), 456-460. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872008X288385
Kohnke, L., Zou, D., & Su, F. (2025). Exploring the potential of GenAI for personalised English teaching: Learners’ experiences and perceptions. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8. 100371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100371
Kusuma, I. P. I., Roni, M., Dewi, K. S., & Mahendrayana, G. (2024). Revealing the potential of ChatGPT for English language teaching: EFL preservice teachers’ teaching practicum experience. Studies in English Language and Education, 11(2), 650-670. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v11i2.34748
Lo, A. W. T. (2025). The educational affordances and challenges of generative AI in Global Englishes-oriented materials development and implementation: A critical ecological perspective. System, 130. 103610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2025.103610
Suardewa, P. M. S., Kusuma, I. P. I., & Dewi, K. S. (2024). The impacts of preservice English teachers’ self-efficacy of using AI towards their intentions of teaching writing skills using AI. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Undiksha, 12(1), 110-119. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpbi.v12i1.80827
Norman, D. A. (1999). Affordance, conventions, and design. Interactions, 6(3), 38-43. https://doi.org/10.1145/301153.301168
Norman, D. A. (2013). The design of everyday things. Basic Books.
Nugroho, A., Putro, N. H. P. S., Syamsi, K., Mutiaraningrum, I., & Wulandari, F. D. (2024). Teacher’s experience using ChatGPT in language teaching: An exploratory study. Computers in the Schools, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2024.2441161
Oliver, M. (2005). The problem with affordance. E-Learning and Digital Media, 2(4), 402-413. https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2005.2.4.402
Omidvar, S., & Meihami, H. (2025). Exploring the “what” and “how” of opportunities and challenges of AI in EFL teacher education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 9, 100443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100443
Setyaningsih, E., Asrori, M. I, Ngadiso, Sumardi, Zainnuri, H., & Hariyanti, Y. (2024). Exploring high school EFL teachers’ experiences with Magic School AI in lesson planning: Benefits and insights. Voices of English Language Education Society, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v8i3.27700
Stefaniak, J., Luo, T., & Xu, M. (2021). Fostering pedagogical reasoning and dynamic decision-making practices: A conceptual framework to support learning design in a digital age. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(4), 2225-2241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-09964-9
Zhang, J., Liu, Z., Lv, H., & Jiang, M. (2024). AI in e-learning: The affordance perspective. Behaviour and Information Technology, 43(15), 3863-3892. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2023.2287660
Zhou, T., & Wu, X. (2025). Examining generative AI user disclosure intention: A perceived affordance perspective. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 20(2). 99. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer20020099
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Alya Rosa Salsabilla, Endang Setyaningsih
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
This ejournal system and its contents are licensed under
a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
