Evaluasi Program Outbound di TK Menggunakan Model Context, Input, Process, Product (CIPP)

Main Article Content

Ryan Hasanudin
Wulan Siti Hajar

Keywords

CIPP Evaluation, Outbound

Abstract

The problem in this research is that there is no evaluation of the outbound program. This study aims to evaluate the Outound Program at TK Pilang 01 for the 2019/2020 academic year. This research uses mixed methods, which is a combination of qualitative and quantitative research using a descriptive approach. This research was conducted from January to April 2020. The subjects in this study were students and the informants were teachers and school principals. Methods of data collection using observation, interviews and documentation and questionnaires. The data analysis technique used interactive analysis, while the questionnaire was analyzed using percentage (percentile) analysis. The conclusion of the context evaluation is that the Outbound program objectives get a score of 80%. Evaluation of the input in this study in the form of children's kinesthetic intelligence abilities and available funding sources obtained a score of 80%. Process Evaluation obtained a score of 75%. Product Evaluation earned a score of 85%. Based on the results of the evaluation, the recommendation given is to continue the program, because the implementation of the program has gone according to expectations and has provided useful results.

References

Bungin Burhan, 2007. Penelitian Kualitatif Komunikasi, Ekonomi, Kebijakan Publik, dan Ilmu Sosial Lainnya. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Daryanto, Muljo. 2012. Model Pembelajaran Inovatif. Yogyakarta: Gava Media.
Dikdayadi Eko, 2016. Evaluasi Pembelajaran PAI di Program Kejar Paket Ulul Albab Desa Dukuh Kecamatan Tangen Kabupaten Sragen 2016/2017. Di terbitkan. Surakarta: Program Sarjana IAIN Surakarta.
Donosuko, 2013. Aplikasi Psikologi Pendidikan dalam Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.
https://quran.kemenag.go.id/index.php/sura/95 diakses pada tanggal 19 Februari 2020 pukul 08:47 WIB.
Idris, Meity H. 2015. Strategi Pembelajaran yang Menyenangkan. Jakarta: Luxima Metro Media.
John W.Creswell, 2014. Reseacrh Design Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Junanto Subar, 2016. Evaluasi Pembelajaran di Madrasah Diniyah Miftachul Hikmah Denanyar Tanon Sragen. At-Tarbawi. 1(2) : hal 178.
Kementrian Agama RI, 2019. Qur’an Asy-Syifaa’. Bandung: Sygma Creative Media Corp.
Moleong Lexy, 2016. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT.Remaja Rosdakarya.
Nurani, Yuliani. 2012. Konsep Dasar Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini. Jakarta: Indeks.
Sarwono Jonathan, 2011. Mixed MethodsCara Menggabungkan Riset Kuantitatif dan Riset Kualitatif Secara Benar. Jakarta: Elex Media Komputindo.
Sugiyono, 2013. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sugiyono, 2016. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, Kuantitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Penerbit Alfabeta.
Sulistyorini, 2009. Evaluasi Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Teras.
Suyadi dan Ulfah, 2012. Konsep Dasar PAUD. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Widiasworo Erwin, 2017. Strategi dan Metode Mengajar Siswa di Luar Kelas. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.
Wiyani, Ardy N. 2016. Konsep Dasar PAUD. Yogyakarta: Gava Media.