Plurality Awareness In Surakarta-Indonesia: Conflict of Map, Awareness of Elite, and Future Challenges
Main Article Content
Keywords
Map of Conflict, awareness, Elite, Future Challenges
Abstract
The purpose of the study is to describe pluralism in society and active efforts or positive interactions in the pluralistic environment to create harmony, tolerance, and mutual respect. This research employs qualitative analysis and descriptive analysis as its technique for analyzing the data. The researcher uses his logic when discussing this research, in which the researcher is an instrument of the research. The validity of the result of this research is carried out by data triangulation analysis. The process of validating the result is also carried out with a focus group discussion which involves seven expert lecturers in the history of civilization. In practice, recognition can be made verbally, in documents, and in behavior (attitude). Active efforts or positive interactions can be in the form of mutual cooperation activities, willingness to get along, helping each other, visiting each other, gathering in a forum to solve a problem, or other activities. In principle, conflicts that have occurred in Surakarta can be identified and triggered by several factors: ethnics factors; political factors (macro politics, national and micropolitics, regional; economic factors (the dominant factor); the factor of social segregation, which consists of social segregation based on ethnic trading area, social segregation based on religious territory, and cultural segregation between the Kasunanan and Mangkunegaran communities having different characteristics.
References
Al-Qarafi, Syarh Tanqih al-Fushul, (Mesir: Maktabah al-Kulliyyah al-Azhariyyah, t.th), p. 391;
Al-Zarkasyi, al-Bahr al-Muhith, (Kuwait: Wizarat al-Auqaf wa al-syu’un al-Islamiyyah, 1993), Jilid VI, p. 612.
Ancok, Jamaludin, Teknik Penyusunan Alat Pengukur,(Yogyakarta: Pusat Penelitian Kependudukan Universitas Gadjah Mada, 1986).
Appelby, R Scott, The Ambivalence of The Sacred. Religion, Violence and Reconciliation. (New York: Carnegie Corporation of New York, 2000).
Baidhawi, Zakiyudin, Dinamika Radikalisme Dan Konflik Sersentimen Keagamaan di Surakarta (Makalah dalam Annual Conference on Islamic Studies (ACIS), presented in Banjarmasin, 1-4 November 2010).
Burke, Peter, Sejarah dan Teori Sosial.(Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesie, 2001).
Campell, Tom, Tujuh Teori Sosial: Sketsa, Penilaian, Perbandingan,(Yogyakarta: Kanisius, I 994).
Carey, Peter, Orang Jawa dan Masyarakat Cina,(Jakarta: Pustaka Azet, 1985).
Daradjadi, Geger Pecinan, Persekutuan Tionghoa-Jawa Melawan VOC. (Jakarta: Kompas, 2013)
Djaelani, Anton Timur, Gerakan Sarekat Islam: Kontribusi Pada Nasionalisme Indonesia. (Depok: LP3ES, 2017)
Fealy, Greg dan Borton. Greg (Editor), Tradisionalisme Radikal: Persinggungan Nahdatul Ulama-Negara,(Yogyakarta: LKIS, 1997).
Geertz, Clifford, The Religion of Java, (London: The University of Chicago Press, 1976)
Gonggong, Anhar, Abdul Qahar Mudzakar. Dari Patriot sampai Pemberontak,(Jakarta: PT. Grasindo, 1992).
Ham, Ong Hok, Kapok Jadi Non Pribumi. (Bandung: Zaman, 1998)
Irwanto (dkk), Membangun Budaya Damai dan Penyelesaian Konflik Tanpa Kekerasa,(Jakarta: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, 2002).
Kartodirdjo, Soejatno, Revolusi di Surakarta tahun 1945 – 1950.terj. RT Muhammad Husodo Tringgokusumo.(Surakarta: Kantor Rekso Pustoko Istana Mangkunegaran, 1988).
Kartodirdjo, Sartono, Pengantar Sejarah Indonesia Baru: 1500-1900, Dari Imporium Sampai Imperium. (Yogyakarta: Penerbit Ombak, 2019)
Koentjaraningrat et, al, Manusia dan Kebudayaan di Indonesia,(Jakarta: Jembatan, 1977).
Korver, A.P.E.K, Sarekat Islam: Gerakan Ratu Adil? (Jakarta: PT Graffiti, 1982)
Larson, Goerge D., Masa Menjelang Revolusi Kraton dan Kehidupan Politik di Surakarta 1912-1942,(Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press, 1990).
Mawardi dan S.W. Yuliani, Dinamika Revolusi Sosial di Surakarta,(Sukoharjo-Solo: Universitas Veteran Bangun Nusantara Sukoharjo, 1995).
Miles, Mattew B. dan Huberman. Michael A., Qualitative Data Analysis, A Sourcebook of New Method, Beverly Hill CA, Sage, 1983.
Muhammad Imarah, Islam dan Pluralitas: Perbedaan dan Kemajemukan dalam Bingkai Persatuan, translated by Abdul Hayyie Al-Kattanie (Jakarta: Gema Insani Press, 1997)
Mulyadi, M. Hari (dkk), Runtuhnya Kekuasaan "Kraton Alit" (Studi Radikal Sosial "Wong Sala" dan Kerusuhan Mei 1998 di Surakarta, (Surakarta: Lembaga Pengembangan Teknologi Pedesaan (LPTP), Surakarta, 1999)
Nurhadiantomo, Konflik-Konflik Sosial Pri-Non Pri Dan Hukum Keadilan Sosial, (Surakarta: Muhammadiyah University Press, 2004)
Panggabean, Samsu Rizal, Konflik dan Perdamaian Etnis, (Jakarta: Alvabet, 2018)
Patton, Michael Quinn, Qualitative Evaluation Methods,(London: Sage, 1983)
Shihab, Alwi, Islam Inklusif, Menunju Sikap Terbuka dalam Beragama, (Bandung: Mizan, 1999), published. VII.
Sudarmono, Konflik Solo: Dari Periode Kolonial–Orde Baru, Paper Presented on Solo Heritage Society in Hotel Agas Solo, August 21st , 2004
Soedarmono, Peace and Reconciliation, 2015, Paper, Unpublished.
Webel, Charles and Johan Galtung, Handbook of Peace and Conflict Studies, (London and New York: Routledge, 2007)
Article Sidebar
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.