##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Submitted
Oct 24, 2022
Published
Dec 28, 2022
Download
Fullpaper.pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 309 Download : 315

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Abstract

This study aims to identify the relationship between self-leadership and innovative behavior in the workplace with self-efficacy and optimism as mediating variables. This study used a convenience sampling method involving 121 Mathematics Teachers in Kebumen District with 121 teachers as respondents. Data were analyzed using quantitatively using the Structural Equation Model (SEM) based on Partial Least Square (PLS). The results showed that self-leadership, optimism, and self-efficacy affected innovative behavior, while self-leadership affected optimism and self-efficacy. Besides, optimism and self-efficacy could mediate the relationship between self-leadership and innovative behavior.

Keywords

Self-leadership Self-efficacy Optimism innovative work behavior

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

References

  1. Abbas, M., & Raja, U. (2015). Impact of psychological capital on innovative performance and job stress. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 32(2), 128–138. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.1314
  2. Akram, T., Lei, S., Haider, M. J., & Hussain, S. T. (2018). Exploring the Impact of Knowledge Sharing on the Innovative Work Behavior of Employees: A Study in China. International Business Research, 11(3), 186. https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v11n3p186
  3. Al-Husseini, S. (2015). Knowledge Sharing Practices as a Basis of Product Innovation: A Case of Higher Education in Iraq. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 5(2), 182–185. https://doi.org/10.7763/ijssh.2015.v5.449
  4. Aristayudha, A. A. N. B., & Richadinata, K. R. P. (2020). Self Efficacy Sebagai Mediasi Antara Self Leadership Dan Entrepreneur Performance Pada Wirausaha Muda Denpasar. E-Jurnal Manajemen Universitas Udayana, 9(11), 3580. https://doi.org/10.24843/ejmunud.2020.v09.i11.p08
  5. Avey, J. B., Reichard, R. J., Luthans, F., & Mhatre, K. H. (2011). Meta-analysis of the impact of positive psychological capital on employee attitudes, behaviors, and performance. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 22(2), 127–152. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.20070
  6. Bak, H. U., Jin, M. H., & McDonald, B. D. (2022). Unpacking the Transformational Leadership-Innovative Work Behavior Relationship: The Mediating Role of Psychological Capital. Public Performance and Management Review, 45(1), 80–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2021.1939737
  7. Chaminade, C., & Lundvall, B.-Å. (2019). Science and Innovation Policy. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.013.179
  8. Chen, W., Zhu, X., Sun, S., Liao, S., & Guo, Z. (2021). The Impact of Employees’ Psychological Capital on Innovative Work Behavior: The Chain Mediating Effect of Knowledge Donating and Knowledge Collecting. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(December). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.761399
  9. Erdem, A. T. (2021). Ethical Leadership, Service Innovation And Psychological Capital Interaction: A Research In Nevşehir Hotel Sector. Uluslararası Anadolu Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, March, 515–532. https://doi.org/10.47525/ulasbid.880952
  10. Ghozali, I. (2018). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program IBM SPSS. 25. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
  11. Gkorezis, P. (2018). High-performance work practices and nurses’ intention to leave: the mediating role of organizational cynicism and the moderating role of human resource management-related educational background. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 29(3), 465–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2016.1255906
  12. Göker, S. D., & Göker, M. Ü. (2020). Rethinking Innovative Learning Opportunities for Teachers in Educational Organizations toward Education 4.0 (S. D. Göker (ed.); p. Ch. 6). IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.93153
  13. Hosseini, S., & Haghighi Shirazi, Z. R. (2021). Towards teacher innovative work behavior: A conceptual model. Cogent Education, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1869364
  14. Houghton, J. D., & Neck, C. P. (2002). The revised self-leadership questionnaire:Testing a hierarchical factor structure for self-leadership. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 17(8), 672–691. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940210450484
  15. Ibus, S. binti, & Ismail, F. binti. (2018). Conceptual Framework: The Mediating Effect of Self-Efficacy in the Relationships of Self-Leadership, Knowledge Sharing, and Innovative Work Behaviour. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(11), 1859–1876. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v8-i11/5378
  16. Khar Kheng, Y., June, S., & Mahmood, R. (2013). The determinants of innovative work behavior in the knowledge intensive business services sector in Malaysia. Asian Social Science, 9(15), 47–59. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v9n15p47
  17. Kör, B. (2016). The mediating effects of self-leadership on perceived entrepreneurial orientation and innovative work behavior in the banking sector. SpringerPlus, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-3556-8
  18. Li, C., Wu, J., & Li, C. (2011). The Structural Relationships Between Optimism and Innovative Behavior : Understanding Potential Antecedents and Mediating Effects The Structural Relationships Between Optimism and Innovative Behavior : Understanding Potential Antecedents and Mediating Eff. March 2015, 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2011.571184
  19. Luthans, F., Avolio, B. J., Avey, J. B., & Norman, S. M. (2007). DigitalCommons @ University of Nebraska - Lincoln Positive Psychological Capital : Measurement and Relationship with Performance and Satisfaction Positive Psychological Capital : Measurement and Relationship with Performance and Satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 60, 541–572.
  20. Messmanna, G., Muldera, R. H., & Grubera, H. (2010). Relations between vocational teachers’ characteristics of professionalism and their innovative work behaviour. Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training, 2(1), 21–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03546487
  21. Neves, P. (2020). A Work Project , presented as part of the requirements for the Award of a Master Degree in Management from the NOVA – School of Business and Economics „ Does self-leadership affect the stress-appraisal of entrepreneurs through increased optimism , self-ef. January.
  22. Prussia, G. E., Anderson, J. O. E. S., & Manz, C. C. (1998). Self-leadership and performance outcomes : The mediating in ¯ uence of self-e  cacy. 538(August 1995), 523–538.
  23. Rego, A., Sousa, F., Marques, C., & Cunha, M. P. (2012). Optimism predicting employees’ creativity: The mediating role of positive affect and the positivity ratio. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 21(2), 244–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2010.550679
  24. Rulevy, D. F., & Parahyanti, E. (2018). Hubungan Psychological Capital Dan Perilaku Kerja Inovatif Di Industri Kreatif: Studi Pada Karyawan Perusahaan Xyz. Journal Psikogenesis, 4(1), 99. https://doi.org/10.24854/jps.v4i1.521
  25. Santoso, S. (2014). Konsep Dasar dan Aplikasi SEM dengan AMOS 22. PT Gramedia Komputindo : Jakarta.
  26. Sarmawa, I. W. G., Ayu, I. G., & Dewi, M. (2017). The Roles Of Knowledge Sharing In Mediating The Effect Of Self-Efficacy And Self-Leadership Toward Innovative Behavior. 19(2), 112–117. https://doi.org/10.9744/jmk.19.2.112
  27. Seligman, M. E. P. (1991). Learned Optimism (N. Y. : A. A. Knopf (ed.)). New York : A.A. Knopf.
  28. States, U., Dawley, D., States, U., & Diliello, T. C. (2002). The abbreviated self-leadership questionnaire (aslq): a more concise measure of self-leadership. 7.
  29. Stewart, G. L., Courtright, S. H., & Manz, C. C. (2011). Self-leadership: A multilevel review. Journal of Management, 37(1), 185–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310383911
  30. Thurlings, M., Evers, A. T., & Vermeulen, M. (2015). Toward a Model of Explaining Teachers’ Innovative Behavior: A Literature Review. Review of Educational Research, 85(3), 430–471. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654314557949
  31. Zainal, M. A., & Matore, M. E. E. M. (2019). Factors Influencing Teachers’ Innovative Behaviour: A Systematic Review. Creative Education, 10(12), 2869–2886. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2019.1012213