THE VIOLATIONS OF THE COOPERATIVE PRINCIPLES IN 'EASY MANDARIN' YOUTUBE CHANNEL CONVERSATIONS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22515/ljbs.v10i1.10295Keywords:
cooperative principle, Mandarin, maxim violation, YouTube channelAbstract
This study analyzes the violations of the cooperative principles in the YouTube channel Easy Mandarin as such violations in social media content reflect authentic language use and provide valuable insights into real world communication and pragmatic language learning. The main objective of this research is to identify how violations of the maxims of quantity, quality, relevance, and manner occur and what factors influence them. The data were collected from the transcription of videos from the YouTube channel by documentation technique. The data consist of 15 interview-style street videos from Easy Mandarin: Learn Mandarin from the Streets episode which were selected based on the highest number of views, with each video having a duration of approximately 12 to 15 minutes. The results of the analysis show that, in violation of the maxim of quantity, respondents often provide information that is less in-depth or too little, even though the purpose of the conversation is to create a comfortable atmosphere. It is found that the use of humour, false statements, and innuendo, in violation of the quality maxim, reduced the accuracy and truthfulness of the information. Meanwhile, violations of the maxim of relevance were identified through avoidance of direct conversation, refusal to develop the topic, and assertion of personal views irrelevant to the question. Finally, the maxim of manner was violated by errors in answering, forgetfulness, anxiety, and the use of empathy, pleasantries, and secrets, all of which obscured the clarity and depth of the conversation. The findings indicate that various social, emotional, and personal factors influence the violation of these maxims, thereby affecting the communication flow in the conversation.
Downloads
References
Achsani, Ferdian. 2019. “Pematuhan dan Pelanggaran Prinsip Kerja Sama dalam Komunikasi Siswa-Siswi MAN 1 Surakarta”. Tarling : Journal of Language Education 2 (2): 147–168. https://doi.org/10.24090/tarling.v2i2.2921.
Fatmawati and Rika Ningsih. 2022. “Alasan Pelanggaran Maksim Cara/Pelaksanaan dalam Prinsip Kerja Sama Grice Pada Budaya Masayarakat Riau”. Sintaks: Jurnal Bahasa & Sastra Indonesia 2 (2): 130–136. https://doi.org/10.57251/sin.v2i2.486.
Grice, Paul. 1991. Studies in The Way of Words. New York: Academic Press.
Ibrahim, Nini. 2021. “Penerapan Prinsip Maksim Kerjasama sebagai Upaya Pengembangan Kemampuan Berbicara”. Pena Literasi 4 (2): 99–107. https://doi.org/10.24853/pl.4.2.99-107.
Leech, Geoffrey. 2016. Principles of Pragmatics (1st Edition). Routledge. https://doi.org/ 10.4324/9781315835976.
Markhamah, Markhamah, and Atiqa Sabardila. 2014. Analisis Kesalahan dan Karakteristik Bentuk Pasif. Surakarta: Muhammadiyah University Press.
Nadar, Franciscus Xaverius. 2009. Pragmatik dan Penelitian Pragmatik. Yogyakart: Graha Ilmu.
Rahardi, Kunjana. 2005. Pragmatik: Kesantunan Imperatif Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Rahardi, Kunjana. 2015. “Menemukan Hakikat Konteks Pragmatik”. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Prasasti II 2015: Kajian Pragmatik dalam Berbagai Bidang: 17-23. https://doi.org/10.20961/pras.v0i0.63.
Rodiah, Huaini and Fatmawati. 2022. “Pelanggaran Maksim Kuantitas dan Alasan Pelanggarannya dalam Corbuzier Podcast Anies Menjawab di Youtube.” Kredo: Jurnal Ilmiah Bahasa dan Sastra 6 (1): 83–101. https://doi.org/10.24176/kredo.v6i1.8442.
Suryani, Intan. 2015. Analisis Pelanggaran Prinsip Kerja Sama dalam Acara Talkshow Hitam Putih Di Trans 7 (Undergraduate Thesis). Pekanbaru: Universitas Islam Riau.
Verhaar, J.W.M. 1996. Asas-Asas Linguistik Umum. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
Wijana, I Dewa Putu. 1996. Dasar-dasar Pragmatik (Cetakan 1). Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Leksema: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the received article shall be assigned to the publisher of the journal. The intended copyright includes the right to publish the article in various forms (including reprints). The journal maintains the publishing rights to published articles.
In line with the license, the authors and users (readers or other researchers) are allowed to share and adapt the material only for non-commercial purposes. In addition, the material must be given appropriate credit, provided with a link to the license, and indicated if changes were made. If authors remix, transform or build upon the material, authors must distribute their contributions under the same license as the original.







