Novice and Professional Interpreters' Material and Mental Process: An SFL-Based Study

Putu Desi Anggerina Hikmaharyanti; Ida Ayu Made Puspani; Ni Wayan Sukarini; Ni Luh Ketut Mas Indrawati

doi:10.22515/ljbs.v11i1.14881

Authors

Putu Desi Anggerina Hikmaharyanti Universitas Mahasaraswati
Ida Ayu Made Puspani Universitas Udayana
Ni Wayan Sukarini Universitas Udayana
Ni Luh Ketut Mas Indrawati Universitas Udayana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22515/ljbs.v11i1.14881

Keywords:

material process, mental process, SFL, simultaneous interpreting

Abstract

The exploration of Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) application particularly the ideational metafunction in spoken text like simultaneous interpreting within a reflective narrative text of legal and security context, focusing on the realization of mental and material processes has been limited to access. This study compares interpreting performance of 3 novices and 3 professional interpreters as they interpret an audio recording from Indonesian to English discussing border issues to investigate the realization of mental and material processes. Through qualitative descriptive approach of the interpreted texts, the study examines how each group constructs experiential meaning, especially in rendering cognitive (mental) and action-oriented (material) processes. Results indicate that novice and professional interpreters used material and mental processes in similar proportions, yet the quality of their realizations varied, with professionals demonstrating more accurate and consistent rendering. Novice interpreters, however, tend to generalize or omit key elements, particularly in complex mental processes, leading to reduced accuracy in meaning transfer. These differences highlight the impact of interpreter experience on the quality of simultaneous interpreting in border reflective narrative contexts containing speaker’s reflection and experience. The findings underscore the value of SFL as an analytical framework in interpreter training and assessment, especially in enhancing sensitivity to ideational meaning within reflective narrative texts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Baker, M. (1992). In other words: A coursebook on translation. Routledge

Christoffels, I., Degroot, A., & Kroll, J. (2006). Memory and language skills in simultaneous interpreters: The role of expertise and language proficiency☆. Journal of Memory and Language, 54(3), 324–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2005.12.004

Consorte, C. (1999). Thematic structure and simultaneous interpretation: Some experimental evidence. The Interpreters’ Newsletter 91, 99–123

Eggins, S. (2004). An Introduction to systemic functional linguistics (2nd ed.). Continuum

Gile, D. (1995). Basic concepts and models for interpreter and translator training. John Benjamins

Gile, D. (2009). Basic concepts and models for interpreter and translator training (Revised ed.) John Benjamins

Guo, Y. (2015). The interpreter’s political awareness as a non-cognitive constraint in political interviews: A perspective of experiential meaning. Babel: International Journal of Translation 61(4), 573–588.

https://doi.org/10.1075/babel.61.4.07yij

Hale, S. (2004). The discourse of court interpreting: Discourse practices of the law, the witness and the interpreter. John Benjamins

Hale, S. (2007). Community interpreting. Palgrave Macmillan

Halliday, M. A. K. (1973). Explorations in the functions of language. Arnold

Halliday, M. A. K. (1993). Towards a language-based theory of learning. Linguistics and Education 5(2), 93–116

Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar. Arnold

Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1985). Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social semiotic perspective. Deakin University Press

Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2014). Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th ed). Routledge

Kim, M. (2007). Using systemic functional text analysis for translator education. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 1(2), 223–246.

https://doi.org/10.1080/1750399X.2007.10798759

Kim, M., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2015). Ways to move forward in translation studies: A textual perspective. Target 27(3), 335–350. https://doi.org/10.1075/target.27.3.01kim

Ma, Y., & Wang, B. (2016). A review of systemic functional translation studies from an interpersonal perspective. International Forum of Teaching and Studies 12(1), 36–41

Mikkelson, H. (2008). Introduction to court interpreting. Routledge

Moser-Mercer, B. (2005). Remote interpreting: Assessment of human factors. Interpreting 7(2): 189–207.

Pöchhacker, F. (2004). Introducing interpreting studies. Routledge.

Seeber, K. G. (2011). The impact of working memory capacity and implicit learning ability on interpreting performance. Interpreting 13(1), 1–20

Torsello, C. T. (1996). Theme as the interpreter’s path indicator through the unfolding text. LINT: 113–150.

Wang, B., & Feng, D. (2018). A corpus-based study of stance-taking as seen from critical points in interpreted political discourse. Perspectives 2(2), 246–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2017.1395468