Cultural Symbol dan Politik Identitas dalam Pembangunan Kota Sampit
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22515/dinika.v4i2.2081Keywords:
Cultural Symbol, Politics of identity, Regent of SampitAbstract
This study aims to trace the cultural symbols and identity politics that occur in the city of Sampit. This is based on several important things that happened in Sampit. Sampit is a heterogeneous and multicultural city and at the same time there were riots between the Dayak and Madura tribes around 2000, which resulted in the emptying and rejection of Madurese residents. At least in the past two decades, Sampit has turned into a city that displays an identity as a Muslim city with the emergence of urban icons built by local elite leaders. It is interesting to track what exactly is behind the elite officials in the city of Sampit in building these identity symbols and how political symbol culture plays a role in the development of the city of Sampit. The analytical tool used in this study is functional sociology where the emphasis of this study is on actors who provide change in society. The results of this study indicate that several values obsess over Cultural Symbol actions in Sampit, including; First, religious values, one of which orientates the cultural symbol policy is that the Sampit community is moved to worship their Lord and minimize criminal acts that used to occur frequently, such as wild speeding, theft and obscene acts. Secondly, art values, symbols used such as the dome and calligraphy of Asmaul Husna and calligraphy of Allah and Muhammad’s writings are expressions of the architectural art values possessed by the Sampit regent which used to beautify the city of Sampit. Third, Political Interest, every policy carried out by an elite certainly cannot be separated from political interests, the Sampit regent is no exception, which in this case is to perpetuate his power, bearing in mind that the regent is in power for two periods untill 2020.
Downloads
References
Abbas, Moh. Rafli. 2016. “Ruang Publik Dan Ekspresi Politik Identitas: Studi Tentang Pergulatan Identitas Ke-Papua-an Di Yogyakarta.” Jurnal Society VI (1): 23–34.
Bagong Suyanto, Dkk. 2011. Metode Penelitian Sosial Berbagai Alternatif Pendekatan. Jakarta: Kencana Media Grup.
Belly, Rayano, and Retno Widjajanti. 2017. “Persepsi Masyarakat Bermukim Di Tepian Sungai Pemuatan Kecamatan Bamaang, Sampit, Kabupaten Kotawaringin Timur.” Jurnal Pembangunan Wilayah & Kota 13 (3): 369–84. https://doi.org/10.14710/pwk.v13i3.17480.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 2014. Menyingkap Kuasa Simbol. Edited by Fauzi Fashri. Yogyakarta: Jala Sutra.
Buchori, Sri Astuti. 2014. Kebangkitan Etnis Menuju Politik Identitas. Jakarta: Pustaka Obor.
Elbadiansyah, Umiarso dan. 2014. Interaksionisme Simbolik Dari Era Klasik Hingga Modern. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Fanzuri, Hamzah. 2017. “Politik Pencitraan, Penguasaan Simbol Dan Kekerasan Simbolik Sebagai Alat Reproduksi Kekuasaan.” Www. Kompasiana.Com. 2017.
Fikri, Sirajudin. 2018. “Politik Identitas Dan Penguatan Demokrasi Lokal (Kekuatan Wong Kito Dalam Demokrasi Lokal).” TAMADDUN: Jurnal Kebudayaan Dan Sastra Islam 18 (2): 167–81. https://doi. org/10.19109/tamaddun.v18i2.2701.
Hakiki, Kiki Muhamad. 2011. “Politik Identitas Agama Lokal: Studi Kasus Aliran Kebatinan.” Analisis XI (1): 159–74.
Hamid, Asep Lukman. 2018. “Politik Identitas Agama Lokal Studi Tentang Aliran Kepercayaan Perjalanan Ciparay Bandung.” Al-Afkar, Journal For Islamic Studies 2 (1): 113–30. https://doi.org/10.31943/ afkar_journal.v2i1.22.
Herusatoto, Budiono. 1998. Simbolisme Dalam Budaya Jawa. Yogyakarta: PT. Hanindita.
Kellner, Douglas. 2010. Budaya Media Cultural Studies, Identitas Dan Politik Antara Modern Dan Post Modern. Edited by Galih Bondan Rambatan. Yogyakarta.
Khoiruddin Bashori, Abd. Madjid, Mahli Zainuddin Tago. 2012. “Dinamika Konflik Dan Integrasi Antara Etnis Dayak Dan Etnis Madura: Studi Kasus Di Yogyakarta Malang Dan Sampit.” Afkaruna 8 (1): 60–79. https://doi.org/10.18196/AIIJIS.2012.
Kotim, BPS. 2017. “Kecamatan Mentawa Baru Ketapang Dalam Angka 2017.”
Mahin, Marko. 2009. “Kaharingan, Dinamika Agama Dayak Di Kalimantan Tengah.” Universitas Indonesia.
Maksum, Ali. 2015. “Politik Identitas Masyarakat Tengger Dalam Mempertahankan Sistem Kebudayaan Dari Hegemoni Islam Dan Kekuasaan.” el-Harakah 17 (1): 18. https://doi.org/10.18860/ el.v17i1.3083.
Notapiri, Tilas. 2017. “Statistik Daerah KOTIM-2017.” Kotawaringin Timur.
Purnawa, Bambang H Suta. 2016. “Konflik Antar Komunitas Etnis Dan Representasi Identitas Etnis Di Sampit, Kalimantan Tengah.” Www.Danurweda. 2016.
Rahim, Idris. 2010. “Identitas Etno Religi Dalam Pembentukan Provinsi Gorontalo.” UIN Yogyakarta.
Saputro, Agus. 2018. “Agama Dan Negara : Politik Identitas Menuju Pilpres 2019.” Asketik 2 (2): 111–20. https://doi.org/10.30762/ ask.v2i2.912.
Setyobudi, Imam. 2017. “Politik Identitas Animal Pop Dance: Subbudaya Dan Gaya Hidup Hibrid.” Jurnal Sosiologi Reflektif12 (1): 55. https:// doi.org/10.14421/jsr.v12i1.1286.
Suryani, Dini. 2012. “Konflik Dan Resolusi Konflik Perbandingan Di Sambas Dan Sampit.” Pusat Penelitian Politik Vol 9 (1): 143–58.
Sutrisno, Mudji. n.d. Cultural Studies, Tantangan Bagi Teori-Teori Besar Kebudayaan. Depok: Koekoesan.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.