Cultural Symbol dan Politik Identitas dalam Pembangunan Kota Sampit

Authors

  • Thau'am Ma'rufah UIN Sunan Kalijaga, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22515/dinika.v4i2.2081

Keywords:

Cultural Symbol, Politics of identity, Regent of Sampit

Abstract

This study aims to trace the cultural symbols and identity politics that occur in the city of Sampit. This is based on several important things that happened in Sampit. Sampit is a heterogeneous and multicultural city and at the same time there were riots between the Dayak and Madura tribes around 2000, which resulted in the emptying and rejection of Madurese residents. At least in the past two decades, Sampit has turned into a city that displays an identity as a Muslim city with the emergence of urban icons built by local elite leaders. It is interesting to track what exactly is behind the elite officials in the city of Sampit in building these identity symbols and how political symbol culture plays a role in the development of the city of Sampit. The analytical tool used in this study is functional sociology where the emphasis of this study is on actors who provide change in society. The results of this study indicate that several values obsess over Cultural Symbol actions in Sampit, including; First, religious values, one of which orientates the cultural symbol policy is that the Sampit community is moved to worship their Lord and minimize criminal acts that used to occur frequently, such as wild speeding, theft and obscene acts. Secondly, art values, symbols used such as the dome and calligraphy of Asmaul Husnaand calligraphy of Allah and Muhammad's writings are expressions of the architectural art values possessed by the Sampit regent which used to beautify the city of Sampit. Third, Political Interest, every policy carried out by an elite certainly cannot be separated from political interests, the Sampit regent is no exception, which in this case is to perpetuate his power, bearing in mind that the regent is in power for two periods untill 2020

References

Akhsan, Muliatul Fajri. “Penggunaan Term Dan Simbol Islam Sebagai Iklan Politik Di Televisi Pada Pemilihan Umum Tahun 2014.†UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, 2015.

Bagong Suyanto, Dkk. Metode Penelitian Sosial Berbagai Alternatif Pendekatan. Jakarta: Kencana Media Grup, 2011.

Berger, Arthur Asa. Pengantar Semiotika: Tanda-Tanda Dalam Kebudayaan Kontemporer. Edited by M. Dwi Satrianto. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana, 2010.

Bourdieu, Pierre. Menyingkap Kuasa Simbol. Edited by Fauzi Fashri. Yogyakarta: Jala Sutra, 2014.

Buchori, Sri Astuti. Kebangkitan Etnis Menuju Politik Identitas. Jakarta: Pustaka Obor, 2014.

———. Kebangkitan Etnis Menuju Politik Identitas. Jakarta: Pustaka Obor, 2014.

Budiman, Arief. Teori Pembangunan Dunia Ketiga. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 1995.

Cooley, Charles Horton. Sociological Theory and Social Research. New York, n.d.

Dever, James. Simbol Dalam Kamus Psikologi. Jakarta: Bina Aksara, 1988.

Dillistone, F.W. Daya Kekuatan Simbol. Edited by A. Widyamataya. Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 2002.

Dkk, Ahmad Syafi’i Maarif. “Politik Identitas Dan Masa Depan Pluralisme Kita.†In Politik Identitas Dan Masa Depan Pluralisme Kita. Jakarta: Democrasi Project, 2012.

Elbadiansyah, Umiarso dan. Interaksionisme Simbolik Dari Era Klasik Hingga Modern. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2014.

Fanzuri, Hamzah. “Politik Pencitraan, Penguasaan Simbol Dan Kekerasan Simbolik Sebagai Alat Reproduksi Kekuasaan.†Www.kompasiana.com. Last modified 2017. Accessed January 30, 2017. https://www.kompasiana.com/avantgarde.

Fikri, Syahruddin El. Sejarah Ibadah Menelusuri Asal-Usul, Memantapkan Penghambaan. Jakarta: Republika, 2014.

Haboddin, Mohtar. “Menguatnya Politik Identitas Di Ranah Lokal.†Jurnal Studi Pemerintahan 3, no. No. 1 (2012): 119.

Herusatoto, Budiono. Simbolisme Dalam Budaya Jawa. Yogyakarta: PT. Hanindita, 1998.

Husein, Sarkawi B. Negara Di Tengah Kota: Politik Representasi Dan Simbolisme Perkotaan (Surabaya 1930-1960). Jakarta: LIPI Press, n.d.

Jones, PIP. Pengantar Teori-Teori Sosial, Dari Fungsionalisme Hingga Post-Modernisme. Edited by Achmad Fedyani Saifuddin. Jakarta: Pustaka Obor, n.d.

Kellner, Douglas. Budaya Media Cultural Studies, Identitas Dan Politik Antara Modern Dan Post Modern. Edited by Galih Bondan Rambatan. Yogyakarta, 2010.

Mahin, Marko. “Kaharingan, Dinamika Agama Dayak Di Kalimantan Tengah.†Universitas Indonesia, 2009.

Notapiri, Tilas. Statistik Daerah KOTIM-2017. Kotawaringin Timur, 2017.

Purnawa, Bambang H Suta. “Konflik Antar Komunitas Etnis Dan Representasi Identitas Etnis Di Sampit, Kalimantan Tengah.†www.Danurweda. Last modified 2016. Accessed April 12, 2016. www. Danurweda.html.

Rahayu, Ummu. “Arti Simbol Bundaran Belangan Dan Tiang Tugu Di Dalamnya.†Kotasampit.com. Last modified 2017. Accessed January 25, 2017.http://kotasampit.com/post/558/arti-simbol-bundaran-balanga-dan-tiang-tugu-di-dalamnya/.

Rahim, Idris. “Identitas Etno Religi Dalam Pembentukan Provinsi Gorontalo.†UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, 2010.

Ruslan, Heri. “Kubah Simbol Kebesaran Islam.†Www.republika.co.id. Last modified 2001. Accessed March 9, 2009. http://www.republika.co.id.

Sastrawati, Nila. “Simbolisme Dalam Pencitraan Partai Politik.†Jurnal Ad Daulah 4, no. No. 1 (2015): 169.

Soekanto. Suatu Pengantar. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2006.

Sutrisno, Mudji. Cultural Studies, Tantangan Bagi Teori-Teori Besar Kebudayaan. Depok: Koekoesan, n.d.

Downloads

Published

2020-01-02

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check