Mononormativity Sentiment Towards Polygamous Ustadz on Social Media
Downloads
Mononormativity widely embraced by societies, often leads to negative sentiment toward non-monogamous relationships. Polygamy, as a form of non-monogamy, challenges this norm, particularly when practiced consensually, revealing a divergence from assumptions that label such relationships as destructive. In Indonesia, where Islam predominates, polygamy is conditionally legitimate under religious law and mutual agreement. However, it frequently faces public criticism and rejection, especially on social media. Religious figures like Ustadz Hanan Attaki, who practice polygamy, often become targets of this negative sentiment, revealing the tension between cultural norms, religious legitimacy, and societal perceptions. This study aims to analyze how mononormativity functions as a form of knowledge-power in constructing negative sentiments towards polygamists, especially ustadz, on social media. Utilizing primary data from social media comments and secondary data from online media and supporting articles, the research employs an explanatory sequential mixed method, where quantitative data supports qualitative insights. Combining sentiment analysis using NVivo and Foucaldian discourse analysis, the paper uncovers how societal norms and power structures shape and reinforce negative sentiments towards polygamists. The quantitative data provides a broad understanding of public opinion, while the qualitative analysis delves deeper into the discourses that perpetuate mononormativity. Through this integration, the study highlights the significant influence of mononormative discourse in shaping societal attitudes and maintaining power dynamics that marginalize non-monogamous relationships.
Downloads
Adha, Alifia Zahratul, Bhirawa Anoraga, Universitas Islam, Internasional Indonesia, and Universiti Teknologi Mara. 2024. “The Dialectics of Polygamy and Feminism: An Analysis of Mentoring Polygamy by Coach Hafidin and Musdah Mulia’s Thoughts,” 33–34. https://doi.org/10.28918/muwazah.v16i1.6847.
Alan, Milchman, and Rosenberg Alan. 2003. Foucault and Heidegger Critical Encounters. University of Minnesota Press.
Ansara, Y. Gávriel. 2023. “Getting Real about Monogamism: Disrupting Mononormative Bias in Sex Therapy and Relationship Counselling.” Relationally Queer: A Pink Therapy Guide for Practitioners, 5–23. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003260561-2.
Arribas-ayllon, Michael, and Valerie Walkerdine. 2017. “Foucauldian Discourse Analysis (Second Edition),” no. January 2017.
Bahar, Komario. 2017. “Video Keharmonisan Poligami Ustad Arifin Ilham, Netizen Nyinyir.” 2017.
C.G., Prado. 2018. Starting With Foucault An Introduction To Geneaolgy. Taylor & Francis.
Cardoso, Daniel, and Christian Klesse. 2010. “Living Outside the Box – Consensual Non-Monogamies, Intimacies and Communities. Notes on Research and Terminology.” In The Handbook of Consensual Non-Monogamy: Affirming Mental Health Practice. Diverse Sexualities, Genders, and Relationships, 421.
Cassidy, Taya, and Gina Wong. 2018. “Consensually Nonmonogamous Clients and the Impact of Mononormativity in Therapy (Les Clients Non Monogames Consensuels et l’impact de La Mononormativité En Thérapie).” Canadian Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy 52 (2): 119–39.
Cresswell, John W. 2014. Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches-SAGE Publications. SAGE Publications.
Donny, Adhiyasa, and Berlian Isra. 2024. “Heboh Isu Ustaz Hanan Attaki Poligami, Netizen Ngaku Shock.” 2024.
Ferrer, Jorge N. 2018. “Mononormativity, Polypride, and the ‘Mono–Poly Wars.’” Sexuality and Culture 22 (3): 817–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-017-9494-y.
———. 2021. Love and Freedom Transcending Monogamy and Polyamory.
Foucault, Michel. 1982. “The Subject and Power. In The Essential Foucault.” Critical Inquiry 8 (4): 777–95.
Ghazaly, Abdur Rahman. 2019. Fiqh Munakahat. Kencana.
Imamah, Fardan Mahmudatul. 2016. “The Construction of Media in the Political Identity of Wearing Jilbab by Policewomen.” DINIKA : Academic Journal of Islamic Studies 1 (3): 327–48. https://doi.org/10.22515/dinika.v1i3.154.
Jane, Stokes. 2003. How To Do Media and Cultural Studies. BENTANG.
Justina, Rostiawati, and Siti Nurwati Khadijah. 2013. “Poligami & Perselingkuhan.” Komnas Perempuan, 1–17.
Mad, Mad. 2024. “Ustaz Hanan Attaki Ketahuan Poligami, Fans Ramai Unfollow,” 2024.
Michaels, Mark A., and Johnson Patricia. 2015. DESIGNER RELATIONSHIPS A GUIDE TO HAPPY MONOGAMY, POSITIVE POLYAMORY, AND OPTIMISTIC OPEN RELATIONSHIPS.
Minhaji. 2019. “Monogami Dan Poligami Dalam Islam ( Perspektif Sejarah-Sosial Hukum Islam ),” 1–15.
Risno Paputungan, Sopyan. 2020. “Argumen Kaum Feminis Terhadap Penolakan Poligami Di Indonesia.” As-Syams 1 (1): 128–52.
Rohmadi, Rohmadi, Fauzan Fauzan, and Wahyu Abdul Jafar. 2022. “Positive and Negative Impacts of Poligamy in The Life of Muslim Family.” Madania: Jurnal Kajian Keislaman 26 (1): 75. https://doi.org/10.29300/madania.v26i1.6483.
Rohman, Arif. 2013. “Reinterpret Polygamy in Islam: A Case Study in Indonesia.” SSRN Electronic Journal 2 (10): 68–74. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2258284.
Scoats, Ryan, and Christine Campbell. 2022. “ScienceDirect What Do We Know about Consensual Non-Monogamy ?” Current Opinion in Psychology 48: 101468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101468.
Shihab, M. QURAISH. 2002. Tafsir Al-Misbah. Lentera Hati.
Sholeha, Adellia Wardatus. 2023. “Tips Mudah Olah Data Kualitatif Dengan Aplikasi Nvivo.” Ebizmark Blog. 2023.
Tina, Timm, and Blow Ardian. 2020. “Fidelity, Infidelity, and Nonmonogamy.” In Couple Relationships in a Global Context Understanding Love and Intimacy Across Cultures, 395–416.
Trigiyatno, Ali. 2012. “PEREMPUAN DAN POLIGAMI DI INDONESIA ( Memotret Sejarah Gerakan Perempuan Dalam Menentang Poligami ).” Muwazah 3 (1): 334–41. https://doi.org/10.28918/muwazah.v3i1.8.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.