CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS ON KOMPAS.COM NEWS: 'GERAKAN #2019GANTIPRESIDEN'

Authors

  • Hendri Pitrio Putra Applied Linguistics, Yogyakarta State University Jl. Colombo No.1, Karang Malang, Caturtunggal, Kec. Depok, Kabupaten Sleman, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, Indonesia 55281
  • Sulis Triyono

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22515/ljbs.v3i2.1412

Keywords:

critical discourse analysis, politics, #2019GantiPresiden, Kompas.com

Abstract

This article is a result of critical discourse analysis (CDA) to the news entitled Gerakan #2019GantiPresiden di Antara Ambiguitas Hukum dan Syahwat Politik at Kompas.com. The approach employed in this research is the three-dimensional CDA developed by Norman Fairclough. The purposes of this research are to describe the micro, mezzo, and macro as well as the social, political and cultural situation from the linguistic aspects in Gerakan #2019GantiPresiden di Antara Ambiguitas Hukum dan Syahwat Politik text. The results show that there are linguistic aspects in the form of diction in the direct sentences that are used by Kompas.com with the theme #2019GantiPresiden. This movement is considered as a constitutional movement indicated as a rebellion because it is supported by political interests towards their current government rival. This is closely related to the background of Kompas.com as a pro-government online mass media. It is also acceptable if Kompas.com creates a positive image of the current government. The main point of information that is conveyed in the news of #2019GantiPresiden is that this movement possibly threats the government of Jokowi Widodo who will run again for the presidential election in 2019.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Hendri Pitrio Putra, Applied Linguistics, Yogyakarta State University Jl. Colombo No.1, Karang Malang, Caturtunggal, Kec. Depok, Kabupaten Sleman, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, Indonesia 55281

Jangan pernah berhenti jadi oarang baik.

References

Asher, RE & JMY Simpson. 1994. The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

Chaer, A & L. Agustina, 2004. Sosiolinguistik Perkenalan Awal (Edisi Revisi). Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta

Darma, Yoce Aliah. 2009. Analisis Wacana Kritis. Bandung: Yrama Widya.

Depdiknas. 2001. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. (Edisi ke-3). Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.

Djaroto, T. 2000. Manajemen Penerbitan Pers. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdaya Karya

Eriyanto. 2011. Analisis Wacana: Pengantar Analisis Teks Media. Yogyakarta: LKiS.

Fairclough, Norman. 1995. Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Longman

Fairclough, Norman. 2003. Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysing for Sosial Research. London: Routledge.

“Gerakan #2019GantiPresiden di antara Ambiguitas Hukum dan Syahwat Politik†on Kompas.com. <https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2018/08/29/09005771/gerakan-2019 ganti presiden-di-antara-ambiguitas-hukum-dan-syahwat-politik> Accessed on September 10, 2018.

Kridalaksana, Harimurti. 2001. Kamus Linguistik. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Leech. Geoffrey. 1997. Prinsip-prinsip Pragmatik. (Translator: MDD Oka). Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia.

Ranksays <http://www.ranksays.com/ kompas.com> Accessed on September 10, 2018

Subroto. 1992. Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada

Sudaryanto. 1993. Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa (Pengantar Penelitian Wahana Kebudayaan Secara Linguistis). Yogyakarta: Duta Wacana University Press.

Tan, Ah-Hwee. 1999. Text Mining: The State of the Art and the Challenges, Singapore: Kent Ridge Digital Labs 21 Heng Mui Keng Terrace.

Wodak, Ruth & Michael Meyer. 2001. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage

Downloads

Published

2018-12-06

Issue

Section

Articles