ISSUES OF WESTERN FEMINISM AND ISLAMIC PARADIGM IN #UNINSTALLFEMINISM DIGITAL CAMPAIGN

Authors

  • Eisha Jamila Qomariyah Yogyakarta State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22515/ljbs.v4i2.1760

Keywords:

CDA, Islamic paradigm, Western feminism, #Unistallfeminism

Abstract

Feminism has established a debatable topic on the current perceptive related to the social movement for defending women's rights. The aims of this research are to describe Instagram caption and image My body is not mine... and other discourse on social perspective, cultural, Western feminism, and Islamic paradigm. Initiated in early March 2019, the digital campaign carried out the crucial jargon #Uninstallfeminism. The method of the research is three-dimensional CDA (critical discourse analysis) based on Fairclough’s theory focusing on feminism issues that are shown on Instagram account @Indonesiatanpafeminisme and @thisisgender. The analytical data construct from the linguistic features of text implementation, discursive practice, and social practice analysis. The result shows on the linguistic feature of text implementation used much diction to describe the dominant-negative sentences that prevent the Western feminism concept. Antifeminism activists are considered as a movement that is guided by the Islamic paradigm and contrary to Western feminism. However, the notion of discourse is not closely related to Al-Quran and Sunnah. It is a different perspective to understand Western feminism that concern with gender equality based on specific situations. The situation develops on historical, perspective, and ideology. This study of feminism field can be inferred that the digital campaign of #Uninstallfeminism gives a significant impact clarifying on a different perspective based on the text from Western feminism that Indonesian women should be back to the religious rules of Islamic feminism.

Author Biography

Eisha Jamila Qomariyah, Yogyakarta State University

Applied Linguistic Department

Yogyakarta State University

References

Agger, Ben. 2009. Teori Sosial Kritis: Kritik, Penerapan, dan Implikasinya. Yogyakarta: Kreasi Wacana.

Arif, Syamsuddin. 2008. Orientalis dan Diabolisme Pemikiran. Jakarta: Gema Insani Press

Bramley, NR. 2001. Pronouns of Politics: The Use of Pronouns in The Construction of ‘Self’ and ‘Other’ in Political Interviews (Thesis) Australian National University

Bhasin, Kamla & Nighat Khan Said.1995. Persoalan Pokok Mengenai Feminisme dan Relevansinya (S. Herlina: trans.). Jakarta: GramediaPustaka

Diah, Irawaty. 2016. “Politik Seksualitas dan Pengabaian Negara Terhadap Kekerasan Seksual di Indonesiaâ€. Jurnal Perempuan, 89

Fairclough, Norman. 1995. Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Longman

Fairclough, Norman. 2003. Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysing for Social Research. London: Routledge

Halliday, MAK, W. Teubert, C. Yallop & A. Cermáková, 2004. Lexicology and Corpus Linguistics. London & New York: Continuum

Komnas Perempuan 2008. Atas Nama Otonomi Daerah, Pelembagaan Diskriminasi dalam Tatanan Negara-Bangsa Indonesia

Lisa, Tuttle. 1986. Encyclopedia of Feminism. New York: Facts of File Publication

McRobbie, A. 2009. The Aftermath of Feminism: Gender, Culture and Social Change. London: Sage publications

Hidayatullah, Syarif. 2010. Teologi Feminism. Yogyakarta: PustakaPelajar

Richardson, Alan. 2002. Mary Wollstonecraft on Education on The Cambridge Companion to Mary Wollstonecraft, (Ed.:Claudia L. Johnson). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Sanders, Valerie. 2006. “First Wave Feminism†in Sarah Gamble (ed.) Cambridge Companion to Feminism and Postfeminism

Thornham, S. 2006. “Feminism and Film†in Sarah Gamble (ed.) The Routledge Companion to Feminism and Postfeminism. London and New York: Routedge

Wodak, Ruth & Michael Meyer. 2001. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: SAGE

Downloads

Published

2019-12-31

Issue

Section

Articles