ILLOCUTIONARY ACTS OF SENT AND UNSENT MESSAGES VIA PERSONAL MESSAGES AND GROUP CHATS

Authors

  • Mark Philippe Guyud San Guillermo Vocational and Industrial High School

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22515/ljbs.v7i2.5368

Keywords:

speech act, illocutionary, conversational implicature, unsent messages

Abstract

New features of communication technology are gaining much attention in computer-mediated communication in relation to speech acts and conversational implicatures which aim to transcend the conventional and nonconventional meaning of words, phrases, or sentences when an interlocutor conveys messages in varied contexts. By examining 30 exchanges and conducting survey interviews, this study concerns the illocutionary acts of sent and unsent messages both in personal messages and group chats via an online messaging application. The findings show that there are 7 identified meanings of unsent messages; moreover, although there are similarities, the meaning varies depending on the context. The study also shows that students use representatives more frequently than the other illocutionary acts in sent messages both in personal and group chats. It is also noteworthy to point out that students rarely use greeting speech acts in their messages.

References

Adjei, Stephen Baffour. 2013. “Discourse Analysis: Examining Language Use in Context”. TQR (The Qualitative Report) 18 (25): 1-10

Antaki, Charles. 2008. “Discourse Analysis and Conversation Analysis”. In Pertti Alasuutari. Leonard Bickman & Julia Brannan. (eds.). The SAGE Handbook of Social Research Methods, London: Sage: 431-446

Austin, John L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Bach, Kent. 1998. “Speech Acts”. in Edward Craig (ed.) Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. London: Routledge

Bahing, et al. 2018. “English Speech Acts of Illocutionary Force in Class Interaction”. Advances in Language and Literary Studies 9 (3): 113-120

Baron, Reuben M & David A Kenny. 1986. “The Moderator–mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 (6): 1173-1182

Barreto, Manuela, Russell Spears, Naomi Ellemers & Khosrow Shahinper. 2003. “Who Wants to Know? The Effect of Audience on Identity Expression among Minority Group Members”. British Journal of Social Psychology 42 (2): 299-318

Bayat, Nihat. 2013. “A Study on the Use of Speech Acts”. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 70: 213-221

Baym, Nancy K. 1995. “The Emergence of Community in Computer-mediated Interaction”. In Steven G Jones (ed.). In Cybersociety: Computer-Mediated Communication and Community: 138-163. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publication

Calculator, Stephen N. 2009. “Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) and Inclusive Education for Students with the Most Severe Disabilities”. International Journal of Inclusive Education 13 (1): 93-113

Davies, Rory. 2005. “Implicatures and the Cooperative Principle”. Language and Culture. Nagoya: Aichi University. https://taweb.aichi-u.ac.jp/tgoken/bulletin/pdfs/NO22/ 01DAVIES.indd.pdf

Erickson, Thomas & Wendy A Kellogg. 2003. “Social Translucence: Using Minimalist Visualizations of Social Activity to Support Collective Interaction”. In Kristina Hook, David Benyon & Alan Munro (eds.), Designing Information Spaces: The Social Navigation Approach: 17-42. New York: Springer

Grice, Paul. 1989. Studies in the Way of Words. Harvard: Harvard University Press

Hall, Jeffrey A, Natalie Pennington, Allyn Lueders. 2014. “Impression Management and Formation on Facebook: A Lens Model Approach”. New Media & Society 16: 958-982

Hickey, Raymond. 2001. “Language Change”. Handbook of Pragmatics 14: 1-38. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company

Hidayat, Agus. 2016. Speech Acts: “Force behind Words”. English Education: Jurnal Tadris Bahasa Inggris 9 (1): 1-12

Kurdghelashvili, Tinatin. 2015. “Speech acts and politeness strategies in an EFL classroom in Georgia”. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology International Journal of Cognitive and Language Sciences 9: 306-309

Lea, Martin & Russell Spears.1995. “Love at First Byte? Building Personal Relationships over Computer Networks”. In Julia T. Wood, & Steve Duck (eds.). Under-studied Relationships: Off the Beaten Track. Understanding Relationship Processes Series 6: 197-233. Thousand Oaks: Sage

Light, Janice & McNaughton, David. 2014. “Communicative Competence for Individuals Who Require Augmentative and Alternative Communication: A New Definition for a New Era of Communication?”. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 30 (1): 1-18

Locke, John L. 2000. “Conversation and Community: Chat in a Virtual World. Lynn Cherny CA: CSLI Publications, 1999. Pp. 369”. Applied Psycholinguistics 21 (1): 152-155

Lund, Shelley K & Janice Light. 2007. “Long-term Outcomes for Individuals Who Use Augmentative and Alternative communication: Part III - Contributing Factors”. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 23 (4): 323-335

McKenna, Katelyn YA, Amie S Green, & Marci EJ Gleason. 2002. “Relationship Formation on the Internet: What’s the Big Attraction?”. Journal of Social Issues 58(1): 9-3

Nastri, Jacqueline, Jorge Pena & Jeffrey T Hancok. 2006. “The Construction of Away Messages: A Speech Act Analysis”. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 11: 1025-1045

Qiu, Lin, Han Lin, Jonathan Ramsay & Fang Yang. 2012. “You Are What You Tweet: Personality Expression and Perception on Twitter”. Journal of Research in Personality 46 (6): 710-718

Ryabova, Marina. 2015. “Politeness Strategy in Everyday Communication”. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 206: 90-95

Sioson, I. 2011. “Anobatalagaang “ano”?: Exploring the Meanings of “ano” in Conversations”. Philippine ESL Journal 6

Spears, Russell & Martin Lea. 1994. “Panacea or Panopticon? The Hidden Power of Computer-mediated Communication”. Communication Research 21: 427-459

Tong, Stephanie, Elena F Corriero, Kunto Adi Wibowo & Taj W Makki. 2019. “Self-Presentation and Impressions of Personality through Text-based Online Dating Profile: A Lens Model Analysis”. New Media & Society 22 (3): 875-895

Downloads

Published

2022-11-28

Issue

Section

Articles