HUBUNGAN ANTARA RELIGIOSITAS DENGAN PERILAKU PROSOSIAL REMAJA DI PANTI ASUHAN YATIM PUTRI ‘AISYIYAH KARANGANYAR
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22515/ajpc.v1i1.2409Keywords:
perilaku prososial, religiositas, Panti Asuhan Yatim Putri ‘Aisyiyah KaranganyarAbstract
Downloads
References
Ancok, D., & Suroso, F. N. (2015). Buku Psikologi Islami: Solusi Islam Atas Problem-Problem Psikologi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Aridhona, J. (2018a). Hubungan Perilaku Prososial dan Religiusitas dengan Moral pada Remaja. Jurnal Psikologi Perseptual, 7(1), 9–19. https://doi.org/10.24036/02018718376-0-00
Aridhona, J. (2018b). Hubungan Perilaku Prososial dan Religiusitas dengan Moral pada Remaja. Konselor, 7(1), 21–25. https://doi.org/10.24036/02018718767-0-00
Arikunto, S. (2014). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Ayten, A. (2017). The Relationship Between Helping Behaviors, Religiosity, and Life Satisfaction: A Case Study on Turkish Muslims. Yakin Doğu Üniversitesi Islam Tetkikleri Merkezi Dergisi, 3(2), 7–25.
Azwar, S. (2016). Penyusunan Skala Psikologi (2 Ed). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Baron, R. A., & Branscombe, N. R. (2011). Social Psychology (13th Ed). London, UK: Pearson Education, Inc.
Baron, R. A., & Byrne, D. (2003). Social Psychology (10th Ed). Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.
Batara, J. B. L., Franco, P. S., Quiachon, M. A. M., & Sembrero, D. R. M. (2016). Effects of religious priming concepts on prosocial behavior towards ingroup and outgroup. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 12(4), 635–644. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v12i4.1170
Batson, C. D. (1976). Religion as Prosocial: Agent or Double Agent? Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 15(1), 29–45. https://doi.org/10.2307/1384312
Batson, C. D., Oleson, K. C., Weeks, J. L., Healy, S. P., Reeves, P. J., Jennings, P., & Brown, T. (1989). Religious Prosocial Motivation: Is It Altruistic or Egoistic? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(5), 873–884. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.873
Cappellen, P. Van, Saroglou, V., & Toth-Gauthier, M. (2014). Religiosity and Prosocial Behavior Among Churchgoers: Exploring Underlying Mechanisms. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 26(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508619.2014.958004
Clark, W. H. (1958). The Psychology of Religion: An Introduction to Religious Experience and Behavior. New York, USA: MacMillan Company.
Einolf, C. J. (2011). The Link Between Religion and Helping Others: The Role of Values, Ideas, and Language. Sociology of Religion, 72(4), 435–455. https://doi.org/10.1093/socrel/srr017
Eisenberg, N., & Mussen, P. H. (1989). The Roots of Prosocial Behavior in Children. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511571121
Guo, Q., Liu, Z., & Tian, Q. (2018). Religiosity and Prosocial Behavior at National Level. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000171
Haryati, T. D. (2013). Kematangan Emosi, Religiusitas Dan Perilaku Prososial Perawat Di Rumah Sakit. Persona:Jurnal Psikologi Indonesia, 2(2), 162–172. https://doi.org/10.30996/persona.v2i2.109
Istiana. (2018). Perbedaan Perilaku Prososial Remaja Ditinjau Dari Jenis Kelamin Di Kelurahan Tanjung Rejo Medan Sunggal. Jurnal Diversita, 4(1), 58–68. https://doi.org/10.31289/diversita.v4i1.1592
Khairunnisa, A. (2013). Hubungan Religiusitas dan Kontrol Diri dengan Perilaku Seksual Pranikah Remaja di Man 1 Samarinda. Psikoborneo: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi, 1(2), 220–229.
Lestari, D., & Partini. (2015). Hubungan Antara Penalaran Moral Dengan Perilaku Prososial Pada Remaja. Jurnal Indigenous, 13(2), 41–46.
Malhotra, D. (2010). (When) are religious people nicer? Religious salience and the “Sunday Effect†on pro-social behavior. Judgment and Decision Making, 5(2), 138–143.
Muryadi, M., & Matulessy, A. (2012). Religiusitas, Kecerdasan Emosi Dan Perilaku Prososial Guru. Jurnal Psikologi Tabularasa, 7(2), 544–561.
Muzakkir. (2013). Hubungan Religiusitas Dengan Perilaku Prososial Mahasiswa Angkatan 2009/2010 Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Keguruan UIN Alauddin Makassar. Jurnal Diskursus Islam, 1(3), 366–380.
Oviedo, L. (2015). Religious attitudes and prosocial behavior: a systematic review of published research. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2014.992803 Downloaded
Rahajeng, U. W., & Wigati, T. Y. A. (2018). Perilaku Prososial Sebagai Prediktor Status Teman Sebaya Pada Remaja. Jurnal Psikologi Teori Dan Terapan, 8(2), 124–132. https://doi.org/10.26740/jptt.v8n2.p124-132
Saifuddin, A. (2019). Psikologi Agama: Implementasi Psikologi untuk Memahami Perilaku Beragama. Jakarta: Kencana.
Saifuddin, A. (2020). Penyusunan Skala Psikologi. Jakarta: Kencana.
Stamatoulakis, K. K. (2013). Religiosity and Prosociality. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 82, 830 – 834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.357
Stark, R., & Glock, C. Y. (1968). American Piety: The Nature of Religious Commitment. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Stavrova, O., & Siegers, P. (2013). Religious Prosociality and Morality Across Cultures: How Social Enforcement of Religion Shapes the Effects of Personal Religiosity on Prosocial and Moral Attitudes and Behaviors. Psychology Bulletin, 40(3), 315–333. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213510951
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.