Kesaksian Orang Bisu dalam Perspektif Hukum Indonesia dan Fikih: Tantangan, Peluang, dan Implikasi Terhadap Keadilan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22515/jurnalalhakim.v6i2.8847Keywords:
Mute Testimony, Comparative Fiqh, Indonesian Positive LawAbstract
This article examines the testimony of mute individuals from the perspectives of Indonesian positive law and the comparative fiqh of the four major Islamic schools of thought (Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi’i, and Hanbali). The study aims to understand the challenges and opportunities in recognizing the testimony of mute individuals in court and its implications for justice. The research employs a normative approach with doctrinal analysis. The findings indicate that Indonesian positive law provides room for the testimony of mute individuals, but there are still obstacles in its implementation, such as the lack of adequate accommodations and qualified interpreters. On the other hand, Islamic fiqh presents varied views on mute testimony, with the Maliki school being more inclusive than others. The article also discusses opportunities for legal reform to create a more inclusive and just judicial system for persons with disabilities. In conclusion, the testimony of mute individuals requires special attention within the legal system to ensure that the principles of justice and equality are upheld.
Downloads
References
Alkaf, ’Abdullah Zaki. Terjemahan Rahmah Al-Ummah Fi Ikhtilaf Al-A’immah Karya Syaikh Al-‘Allamah Muhammad Bin ‘Abdurrohman Ad-Dimasyqi. Bandung: Hasyimi, 2015.
Badriyyah, Lu’luatul, and Ashif Az-Zafi. “Perbedaan Mazhab Empat Imam Besar (Hanafi, Maliki, Syafi’i, Dan Hambali) Dalam Paradigma Hukum Fikih” 5, no. 1 (2020): 66–67. https://doi.org/10.31604/muaddib.v5i1.65-79.
Barkah, Aah Laelatul. “Perlindungan Hak Penyandang Disabilitas Tuna Grahita Sebagai Saksi Korban Dalam Proses Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia.” ‘Adliya 12, no. 2 (2018): 126-128. https://doi.org/10.15575/adliya.v12i2.4494.
Bekti, Nindayani Ainan Nirmaya, and I Gede Artha. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Penyandang Disabilitas Sebagai Saksi Dan Korban Tindak Pidana Dalam Proses Peradilan.” Journal Ilmu Hukum 8, no. 5 (2019): 8.
Gunawan, Hendra. “Sistem Peradilan Islam.” Junal El-Qanuny 5, no. 1 (2019): 99. https://doi.org/10.24952/el-qonuniy.v5i1.1766.
Hanafi, Darmawati, and Anggi Anggraini. “Hubungan Hukum Islam Dengan Hukum Positif.” Sulesana: Jurnal Wawasan Keislaman 12, no. 1 (2018): 39. https://doi.org/10.24252/sulesana.v12i1.5666.
Husaini, Hasan, Mariani, Ahmadi Hasan, and Jalaluddin. “Peran Hukum Islam Dalam Pembangunan Hukum Nasional Di Indonesia.” UNES Law Review 6, no. 2 (2023): 4289. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.
Kawengian, Tiovany A. “Peranan Keterangan Saksi Sebagai Salah Satu Alat Bukti Dalam Proses Pidana Menurut KUHAP.” Lex Privatum 4, no. 4 (2016): 30–34.
Kusumawati, Tri Indah. “Komunikasi Verbal Dan Nonverbal.” Al-Irsyad: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Konseling 6, no. 2 (2016): 86. https://doi.org/10.30829/al-irsyad.v6i2.6618.
Musyafaah, Nur Lailatul. “Kedudukan Dan Fungsi Kaidah Fikih Dalam Hukum Pidana Islam.” , Al-Jinayah: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Islam 4, no. 1 (2018): 136. https://doi.org/10.15642/aj.2018.4.1.131-146.
Nasoha, Ahmad Muhamad Mustain. “Eksistensi Penerapan Hukuman Mati Di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Syari’ah Dan Hukum.” Al-Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syari’ah Dan Hukum 1, no. 1 (2016): 3–4. https://doi.org/10.22515/al-ahkam.v1i1.46.
Nasoha, Ahmad Muhamad Mustain, and Bayu Assri Novianto. “Nilai-Nilai Pendidikan Fiqih Dalam Kitab Nurul Burhan Karya Syaikh Muslih Bin Abdurrahman Al Maraqi.” Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Konseling 5, no. 1 (2023): 1181. https://doi.org/10.31004/jpdk.v5i1.11131.
Nasoha, Ahmad Muhamad Mustain, and Ananda Megha Wiedhar Saputri. “Analisis Kritis Perkawinan Yang Dilarang Di Indonesia Ditinjau Dari Fiqih Perbandingan Mazhab.” Jurnal Bedah Hukum 6, no. 1 (2022): 61. https://doi.org/10.36596/jbh.v6i1.771.
Nasoha, Ahmad Muhammad Mustain, Nadia Khoirotun Nihayah, and Alfina Arga Winati. “Analisis Kawin Paksa Dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam.” El-Faqih: Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Hukum Islam 9, no. 2 (2023): 144–145. https://doi.org/10.58401/faqih.v9i2.1119.
Novianti, Tri, and Ricky Fadila. “Kedudukan Keterangan Saksi Penyandang Disabilitas Dalam Hukum Acara Pidana.” PETITA 5, no. 1 (2023): 66. https://doi.org/10.33373/pta.v5i1.5528.
Nurhayati. “Memahami Konsep Syariah, Fikih, Hukum Dan Ushul Fikih.” Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah 2, no. 2 (2018): 129.
Pohan, Zakirun. “Eksistensi Mazhab Fiqih Pada Zaman Kontemporer Sekarang.” Al-Ilmu 6, no. 1 (2021): 7–8.
Rapini, Azizah Mohd, and Ruzman Md Noor. “Prinsip Keadilan Dalam Sistem Kehakiman Islam: Tumpuan Khusus Terhadap Konsep Syahadah.” Journal of Fatwa Management and Research 9, no. 1 (2017): 130–131.
Rasyid, Arbanur. “Kesaksian Dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam.” Jurnal El-Qanuniy 6, no. 1 (2020): 21. https://doi.org/10.24952/el-qanuniy.v6i1.2442.
Rohmat, Akhmad Khubby Ali, Moh. Bagus, Siti Partiah, M. Habibi Royi Kholiqunnur, and Mochammad Fauzi. “Positivisme Dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Perkembangan Hukum Di Indonesia.” Ma’mal: Jurnal Laboratorium Syariah Dan Hukum 3, no. 3 (2022): 221. https://doi.org/10.15642/mal.v3i3.135.
Saenah, Siti. “Jenis-Jenis Alat Bukti: Studi Perbandingan Antara Hukum Islam Dan Hukum Acara Perdata.” Jurista 6, no. 1 (2017): 75.
Santoso, Gunawan, Aim Abdul Karim, Bunyamin Maftuh, Sapriya, and Ma’mun Murod. “Kajian Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia Untuk Membentuk Perdamian Dalam Bhinneka Tunggal Ika Indonesia Abad 21.” Jurnal Pendidikan Transformatif (Jupetra) 2, no. 1 (2023): 215. https://doi.org/10.9000/jupetra.v2i1.143.
Sari, Indah, Fivrenodi, Eka Altiarika, and Sarwindah. “Sistem Pengembangan Bahasa Isyarat Untuk Berkomunikasi Dengan Penyandang Disabilitas (Tunarungu).” Journal of Information Technology and Society (JITS) 1, no. 1 (2023): 20. https://doi.org/10.35438/jits.v1i1.21.
Sodiqin, Ali. “Ambiguitas Perlindungan Hukum Penyandang Disabilitas Dalam Perundang-Undangan Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia 18, no. 1 (2021): 35. https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v18i1.707.
Suhartono, Slamet. “Hukum Positif Problematik Penerapan Dan Solusi Teoritiknya.” Dih: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 15, no. 2 (2019): 202. https://doi.org/10.30996/dih.v15i2.2549.
Sulaiman, Eman. “Hukum Dan Kepentingan Masyarakat (Memosisikan Hukum Sebagai Penyeimbang Kepentingan Masyarakat).” Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Studi Islam 4, no. 2 (2018): 160. https://doi.org/10.59638/ash.v4i2.192.
Tarigan, Daniel Milano, and Muhammad Rustamaji. “Nilai Dan Kekuatan Pembuktian Keterangan Samsi Testimonium De Auditu.” Verstek 11, no. 3 (2023): 509. https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v9i2.51071.
Taufiq, M. “Konsep Dan Sumber Hukum: Analisis Perbandingan Sistem Hukum Islam Dan Sistem Hukum Positif.” Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Hukum Islam 5, no. 2 (2021): 91. https://doi.org/10.35316/istidlal.v5i2.348.
Zulkifli. “Tuntutan Keadilan Perspektif Hukum Islam.” Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah 17, no. 1 (2018): 142. https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v17i1.1005.
Downloads
Submitted
Accepted
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Syahrul Hanafi, Ahmad Muhamad Mustain Nasoha, Arif Nurrohman, Ashfiya Nur Atqiya
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a 