Analisis Pelaksanaan Microteaching Mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan Agama Islam

Authors

  • Khuriyah Khuriyah

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22515/attarbawi.v2i2.990

Abstract

The problem in this research is the implementation of microteaching in PAI departement  FITK IAIN Surakarta has not been evaluated and need to know the urgency after the existence of several courses of learning strategy that is substantially the same as the implementation of microteaching activities.The research method used is descriptive, carried out for three months since April-June 2016. The population of this research is the students of semester V of academic year 2015/2016 that follow the microteaching of 450 students, the research sample is 260 students. The results show that: 1) The implementation of microteaching as a whole has fulfilled the provisions of microteaching implementation as stated in the microteaching guide book. Each student performs teaching practice as much as 4-5 times, previously required to prepare RPP which will be reviewed and corrected by supervisor (DPL). In implementing the teaching practice, students are required to practice one of the teaching strategies in accordance with the material to be submitted; 2) Although the students have obtained several courses of instructional strategies that note more of the practice of teaching both groups and individuals, but 81% of students stated that microteaching is still needed.

 

Keywords: Analysis, Microteaching.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ajileye, Mosunmola Ajibola. 2013. Effects of microteaching skills on studentteachers’ performance on teaching practicein colleges of education, north-central, Nigeria. Department of Educational Technology, University of Ilorin, Ilorin, Nigeria.

Asmani, Jamal Ma’mur. 2010. Pengenalan dan Pelaksanaan Lengkap Microteaching danTeam Teaching. Yogyakarta: Diva Press

Asril, Zaenal. 2011. Micro Teaching. Jakarta: Radja Grafindo Persada

B C. Ijioma, Dr. M. N. Obasi & Dr. P.C Ifegbo. 2014. Integrating Microteachin g Theory + Practice in Concurrent and Consecutive Teacher Education Programmes: Benefits and Challenges.. Report and Opinion 2014; 6(9) http://www.sciencepub.net/report

B. Veena Kumari and Digumarti Bhaskara Rao. (2004) Methods of Theaching Social Studies. New Delhi : Dynamic Printers Delhi

Imran Mahmud, Shahriar Rawshon. 2013. Micro Teaching to Improve Teaching Method: An Analysis onStudents’ Perspectives. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSR-JRME)e-ISSN: 2320–7388,p-ISSN: 2320–737X Volume 1, Issue 4 (May. –Jun. 2013), PP 69-76www.iosrjournals.org

J.J. Hasibuan, dan Moedjiono. 2010. Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya

Mastromarino, R. 2004. The use of microteaching in learning the redecision model: A proposal for an observation grid. Transactional Analysis Journal, 34, 1, 37-47

Nana Syaodih Sukmadinata. 2011. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya

Oemar Hamalik. 2009. Pendidikan Guru Berdasarkan Pendekatan Kompetensi. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara

Sri Slamet. 2014. Evaluasi Pengajaran Micro Teaching Berbahasa Inggris Pada Jurusan Non Bahasa Inggris https://publikasiilmiah.ums.ac.id/ bitstream/handle/11617/5641/Evaluasi%20Pengajaan%20Micro%20Teaching%20Berbahasa%20Inggris.pdf?sequence=1

Team Microteaching FITK. 2016. Buku Panduan Micro Teaching. Surakarta: FATABA Press.

Downloads

Published

2017-12-15

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check