Turkish Girls: The Veil and a Sense of Belonging to Germany
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22515/bg.v7i1.4675Keywords:
Turkish, girls, Muslim, Veil, immigrant origin, sense of belongingAbstract
This article focuses on Turkish girls who wear the veil and their sense of belonging in Germany. Data was collected in five different cities in the federal state of North Rhein Westphalia from girls who were from 13 to 21 years old. Focus group interviews, socio-economic questionnaire and life history interviews were the source for the data. The data was analysed with Grounded Theory (Charmaz 2019). The analysis interprets how being Muslim, wearing the veil, and gender intersect in defining belonging to a nation.
References
Altuntaş, N. (2009). The transition from the Traditional to the Modern: Islam and Turkish Women in Germany. In Kücükcan, T., Gungor, V. (Eds.), Turks in Germany: Culture, Identity, Integration, Netherlands: Turkevi Research Centre.
Andreassen, R., & Lettinga, D. (2012). Veiled debates: Gender and gender equality in European national narratives. na.
Baysu, G., Phalet, K., & Brown, R. (2011). Dual identity as a two-edged sword: Identity threat and minority school performance. Social Psychology Quarterly, 74(2), 121-143.
Bendixsen, S. (2017). Muslim Youth Practising Veiling in Berlin: Modernity, morality and aesthetics. In The Routledge International Handbook to Veils and Veiling (pp. 174-183). Routledge.
Berry, J. W., Phinney, J. S., Sam, D. L., & Vedder, P. E. (2006). Immigrant youth in cultural transition: Acculturation, identity, and adaptation across national contexts. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Bowskill, M., Lyons, E., & Coyle, A. (2007). The rhetoric of acculturation: When integration means assimilation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46(4), 793-813.
Braun, K. (2017). How much veil is too much veil: on the constitutionality and advisability of face veil bans for German public school students. German Law Journal, 18(6), 1331-1358.
Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (Eds.). (2019). The SAGE Handbook of Current Developments in Grounded Theory. SAGE Publications Limited.
Chun Tie, Y., Birks, M., & Francis, K. (2019). Grounded theory research: A design framework for novice researchers. SAGE open medicine, 7, 2050312118822927.
Crul, M., & Mollenkopf, J. (2012). The Second Generation. In Crul, M., & Mollenkopf, J. (Eds.), The changing face of world cities: Young adult children of immigrants in Europe and the United States. Russell Sage Foundation.
Davis, K., Minckas, N., Bond, V., Clark, C. J., Colbourn, T., Drabble, S. J., ... & Osrin, D. (2019). Beyond interviews and focus groups: a framework for integrating innovative qualitative methods into randomised controlled trials of complex public health interventions. Trials, 20(1), 329.
Deutschland, S. (Ed.). (2015). Jugend 2015: 17. Shell Jugendstudie. S. Fischer Verlag.
Flynn, R., Albrecht, L., & Scott, S. D. (2018). Two approaches to focus group data collection for qualitative health research: Maximizing resources and data quality. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 17(1), 1609406917750781.
Ghorashi, H. (2010). Paradoxen van culturele erkenning: Management van diversiteit in nieuw Nederland. Tijdschrift voor Genderstudies, 9(4).
Gökarıksel, B., & Secor, A. (2014). The veil, desire, and the gaze: Turning the inside out. Signs: journal of women in culture and society, 40(1), 177-200.
Herzog-Punzenberger, B., & Schnell, P. (2012). Die Situation mehrsprachiger Schüler/innen im österreichischen Schulsystem–Problemlagen, Rahmenbedingungen und internationaler Vergleich. Nationaler Bildungsbericht Österreich, 2, 229-268.
Jessee E. (2018) The Life History Interview. In: Liamputtong P. (eds) Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences. Springer, Singapore
Koç, G. (2009). Turks in Austria and Germany: Stereotypes and xenophobia. Turks in Europe Culture, identity, integration, 103-127.
Kruger, L. J., Rodgers, R. F., Long, S. J., & Lowy, A. S. (2019). Individual interviews or focus groups? Interview format and women’s self-disclosure. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 22(3), 245-255.
Meeus, W., Van De Schoot, R., Keijsers, L., Schwartz, S. J., & Branje, S. (2010). On the progression and stability of adolescent identity formation: A five‐wave longitudinal study in early to‐middle and middle‐to‐late adolescence. Child development, 81(5), 1565-1581.
O. Nyumba, T., Wilson, K., Derrick, C. J., & Mukherjee, N. (2018). The use of focus group discussion methodology: Insights from two decades of application in conservation. Methods in Ecology and evolution, 9(1), 20-32.
Schneider, J., Chavez, L., DeSipio, L., & Mollenkopf, J. (2012). Belonging. In Crul, M., & Mollenkopf, J. (Eds.), The changing face of world cities: Young adult children of immigrants in Europe and the United States (206-235). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Schneider, J., & Crul, M. (2012). Comparative Integration Context Theory: Participation and Belonging. In Crul, M., Schneider, J., & Lelie, F. (Eds.), The European second generation compared.
Tran, V., Brown, S. K., & Schneider, J. (2012). Neighborhoods and perceptions of disorder. The Changing Face of World Cities: Young Adult Children of Immigrants in Europe and the United States, 156-182.
Wilpert, C. (2013). Identity Issues in the History of the Postwar Migration from Turkey to Germany. German Politics and Society, 31(2), 108-131.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
