Apakah Desain Eksperimen Satu Kelompok Layak Digunakan?

Authors

  • Ahmad Saifuddin IAIN Surakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22515/literasi.v1i1.3255

Keywords:

Eksperiment, one group design, validity

Abstract

Research is a form of effort to achieve truth. Research is divided into several methods, namely qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method. Each of these research methods includes several research techniques, one of which is experimental research. Experimental research including quantitative research methods. Broadly speaking, experimental research is divided into pre-experiment, quasi experiment, and true experiment. Many studies still use a one-group design. This study aims to assess the feasibility of one group design using a literature study. The result is that the experimental design of one group is considered less suitable for use in research due to several factors, namely the minimal number of groups, no control group, not random, and low validity.

References

Akhir, M. (2017). Penerapan Strategi Belajar Reciprocal Teaching terhadap Kemampuan Membaca pada Siswa SD. Indonesian Journal of Primary Education, 1(2), 30–38. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijpe.v1i2.9313

Aliaga, M., & Gunderson, B. (2005). Interactive Statistics (3rd Ed). London, United Kingdom: Pearson.

Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research on teaching. In N. L. Gage (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 171–246). Chicago, Illinois, United States: Rand McNally. Reprinted in 1966 under the title Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research.

Cozby, P. C., & Bates, S. (2011). Methods in Behavioral Research (11th Ed). New York, USA: McGraw-Hill Education.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th Ed). Thousand Oaks, California, United States: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Daniel, E. (2016). The Usefulness of Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches and Methods in Researching Problem-Solving Ability in Science Education Curriculum. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(15), 91–100.

Doyle, L., Brady, A.-M., & Byrne, G. (2009). An overview of mixed methods research. Journal of Research in Nursing, 14(2), 175–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 1744987108093962

Fitrianingsih, R., & Musdalifah. (2015). Efektivitas Penggunaan Media Video Pada Pembelajaran Pembuatan Strapless Siswa Kelas XII SMK Negeri 1 Jambu. Fashion and Fashion Education Journal, 4(1), 1–6.

Hadi, S. (2016). Metodologi Riset. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Hanurawan, F. (2012). Qualitative Research in Psychology. Journal of Educational, Health and Community Psychology, 1(2), 120–132. https://doi.org/10.12928/jehcp.v1i2.3802

Harris, A. D., MGregor, J. C., Perencevixh, E. N., Furuno, J. P., Zhu, J., Peterson, D. E., & Finkelstein, J. (2006). The Use and Interpretation of Quasi-Experimental Studies in Medical Informatics. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 13(1), 16–23. https://doi.org/10.1197/jamia.M1749

Iswara, W., Gunawan, A., & Dalifa, D. (2018). Pengaruh Bahan Ajar Muatan Lokal Mengenal Potensi Bengkulu Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa. Jurnal PGSD, 11(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.33369/pgsd.11.1.1-7

Jackson II, R. L., Drummond, D. K., & Camara, S. (2007). What Is Qualitative Research? Qualitative Research Reports in Communication, 8(1), 21 — 28. https://doi.org/10.1080/17459430701617879

Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a Definition of Mixed Methods Research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806298224

Kashdan, T. B., Stiksma, M. C., Disabato, D. J., McKnight, P. E., Bekier, J., Kaji, J., & Lazarus, R. (2018). The five-dimensional curiosity scale: Capturing the bandwidth of curiosity and identifying four unique subgroups of curious people. Journal of Research in Personality, 73, 130–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2017.11.011

Knapp, T. R. (2016). Why Is the One-Group Pretest–Posttest Design Still Used? Clinical Nursing Research, 25(5), 467 –472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1054773816666280

Krulik, S., & Rudnick, J. A. (1980). Problem Solving: A Handbook For Teachers. Boston, Massachusetts, United States: Allyn and Bacon, Inc.

Latipun. (2015). Psikologi Eksperimen. Malang: UMM Press.

Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2018). Practical Research: Planning and Design (12th Ed). London, United Kingdom: Pearson.

Loewenstein, G. (1994). The Psychology of Curiosity: A Review and Reinterpretation. Psychological Bulletin, 116(1), 75–98.

Marsden, E., & Torgerson, C. J. (2012). Single group, pre- and post-test research designs: Some methodological concerns. Oxford Review of Education, 38(5), 583–616. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2012.731208

Mildner, V. (2019). Experimental Research. In J. S. Damico & M. J. B. Book (Eds.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Human Communication Sciences and Disorders (pp. 728–732). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483380810.n242

Mitchell, O. (2016). Experimental Research Design. In W. G. Jennings (Ed.), The Encyclopedia ofCrime and Punishment (1st Ed, pp. 1–6). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118519639.wbecpx113

Palmer, C., & Bolderston, A. (2006). A Brief Introduction to Qualitative Research. The Canadian Journal of Medical Radiation Technology, 37(1), 16–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0820-5930(09)60112-2

Pithon, M. M. (2013). Importance of the control group in scientific research. Dental Press J Orthod, 18(6), 13–14.

Rahmawati, Yani, A., & Nurlina. (2015). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah terhadap Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Kelas X MIA 1 SMA Negeri 2 Sungguminasa Kabupaten Gowa. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar, 3(3), 263–269. https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v3i3.278

Saifuddin, A. (2019). Penelitian Eksperimen Dalam Psikologi. Jakarta: Kencana.

Santoso, A. (2017). Benarkah Ukuran Sampel Minimal = 30? Jurnal Psikologi Indonesia, XII(1), 63–84.

Seniati, L., Yulianto, A., & Setiadi, B. N. (2005). Psikologi Eksperimen. Jakarta: Penerbit Indeks.

Sevilla, C. G., Ochave, J. A., Punsalan, T. G., Regala, B. P., & Uriarte, G. G. (1984). An introduction to research methods. Manila, Philippines: Rex Book Store.

Shadish, W. R., Campbell, D. T., & Cook, T. D. (2002). Experimental and quasi- experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston, Massachusetts, United States: Houghton Mifflin.

Smith, M. L. (1981). Naturalistic Research. The Personnel and Guidance Journal, 59(9), 585–589. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2164-4918.1981.tb00623.x

Suri, F., & Mariatin, E. (2017). Pengaruh Pencahayaan Ruang Kerja Terhadap Stres Kerja Karyawan Biro Perencanaan dan Kerjasama Universitas Sumatera Utara. Jurnal Diversita, 3(2), 9–14. https://doi.org/10.31289/diversita.v3i2.1255

Susanti, S., Purmintasari, Y. D., & Suwarni. (2016). Pengaruh Penerapan Metode Pembelajaran SQ3R (Survey, Question, Read, Recite, and Review) Terhadap Hasil Belajar Mahasiswa Prgram Studi Pendidikan Sejarah IKIP PGRI Pontianak. Edukasi: Jurnal Pendidikan, 13(1), 97–104. https://doi.org/10.31571/EDUKASI.V13I1.23

Taufik, R., Hustim, R., & Nurlina, N. (2014). Penerapan Pembelajaran Partisipatif Metode True-False Dalam Pembelajaran Fisika Pada Siswa Kelas VIIB SMP Negeri 17 Bulukumba. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Unismuh, 2(3), 245–260.

Williams, C. (2007). Research methods. Journal of Business & Economic Research, 5(3), 65–72. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108656184.003

Wiradhany, W., Adiasto, K., Yulianto, J. E., & Kiling, I. Y. (2019). Pemahaman Peneliti dan Mahasiswa Psikologi mengenai Besaran Sampel: Data dan Simulasi. Jurnal Psikologi, 46(2), 163–180. https://doi.org/10.22146/jpsi.24260

Zainudin, A., & Ediati, A. (2016). Perbandingan Kemampuan Empati Anak Sebelum dan Sesudah Mendapatkan Pendidikan Lingkungan (Studi Eksperimen Pada Siswa Kelas V SD Negeri Blotongan 02 Salatiga). Jurnal Empati, 5(2), 367–372.

Downloads

Published

2021-01-04

Citation Check