Total Physical Response and Direct Method in Students’ Vocabulary Mastery Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22515/shahih.v1i1.54Abstract
Abstract
The objective of this study was to test which one of the two methods (TPR and DM) were more effective to improve the students’ vocabulary mastery. The population of this study was all of the fifth graders of SD Islam Sultan Agung 4 Semarang in the academic year of 2015/2016. The instrument of the study was vocabulary test consisted of multiple choice items and matching items. Before treatment was given, pre-test was conducted to both groups. Meanwhile, post-test was conducted after the treatment had finished. The result showed that the mean of the experimental and control group in pre-test were 64.35 and 65.30, respectively. After being given the treatment, post-test was conducted in both groups. The t-test calculation showed that there was a significant difference. So, Total Physical Response method was more effective than Direct Method in learning English Vocabulary to the fifth graders of Elementary Students.
Keywords: Total Physical Response, Direct method, and Vocabulary
Abstrak
Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menguji mana dari dua metode (TPR dan DM) yang lebih efektif untuk meningkatkan kemampuan penguasaan kosa kata siswa. Subjek penelitiannya adalah semua siswa kelas 5 SD Islam Sultan Agung 4 Semarang Tahun Ajaran 2015/2016. Instrumen penelitiannya berupa tes kosa kata yang terdiri dari pilihan ganda dan menjodohkan. Sebelum perlakuan diberikan, kedua grup diberikan pre-test. Sedangkan post-test diberikan setelah perlakuan selesai. Hasilnya menunjukkan bahwa rata-rata grup eksperimen dan kontrol berturut-turut adalah 64.35 dan 65.30. Setelah diberikan perlakuan, kedua grup diberikan post-test. Nilai rata-rata untuk kedua grup berturut-turut adalah 78.65 dan 71.70. Perhitungan t-test menunjukkan adanya perbedaan yang mencolok. Jadi, metode Total Physical Response lebih efektif daripada Direct Method dalam pembelajaran kosa kata Bahasa Inggris pada siswa kelas lima sekolah dasar.
Kata Kunci: Total Physical Response, Direct method, and Vocabulary
References
Airasian, P. W. and L. R. Gay. (2000). Education Research: Competence for Analysis and Application (6th Ed.). New Jersey: Merrill Prentice Hall.
_____________ and Russel, M. K. (2008). Classroom Assessment. (6th Ed.) Boston: McGraw-Hill Publishing Company.
_____________., L. R. Gay., and G. E. Mills. (2011). Educational Research:
Competencies for Analysis and Applications (10th Ed.). New Jersey: Pearson
Education, Inc.
Arikunto, Suharsimi. (2006). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.
Azhar, Lalu M. (1993). Proses Belajar Mengajar Pola C.B.S.A. Surabaya: Usaha Nasional.
Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by Principles: and Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. (2nd Ed.). San Francisco State University: Longman.
Cameron, Lynne. (2001). Teaching Languages to Young Learners. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
El-Koumy, Abdel S. A. K. (2004). Teaching and Learning English as A Foreign Language: A Comprehensive Approach. USA: Educational Resources Information Center (ERIC).
Fraenkel, Jack R. And Norman E. Wallen. (2009). How to Design and Evaluate
Research in Education. (7th Ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Ghani and Ghous. (2014). The Effectiveness of Total Physical Response (TPR) Approach in Helping Slow Young Learners with Low Achievement Acquire English as A Second Language. International Journal of Research in Social Science. Vol. 4, No.6, 2014. Retrieved on May 185, 2015 from the World Wide Web: www. Ijsk.org/ijrss
Ghozali, I. (2011). Aplikasi Multivariate: Dengan program SPSS. Semarang: Diponegoro University.
Harris, D. P. (1969). Testing English as a second Language. USA: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
Hartono. (2008). SPSS 16.0 Analisis Data Statistika dan Penelitian. Yogyakarka: Pustaka Belajar.
Kothari, C.R. (2004). Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques. (2nd revised Ed.). New Delhi: New age International Publishers.
Richards, J. C. and Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wilkins, David A. (1972). Linguistics in Language Teaching. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
This ejournal system and its contents are licensed under
a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
