From Modernism to Neo-Modernism: A Religio-Political Context of Muhammad Abduh and Fazlur Rahman
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22515/shahih.v7i2.6066Keywords:
Muhammad Abduh, Fazlur Rahman, Modernism, Neo Modernism, Religiopolitical ContextAbstract
Muhammad Abduh and Fazlur Rahman are among the influential Muslim scholars after the Medieval era of the eighteenth to twentieth century. Their characteristics of thought are often titled Muhammad Abduh as a Modernist and Fazlur Rahman as a Neo-Modernist. Their ideas became significant since they influenced several contemporary Muslim scholars in the Muslim world, such as Rashid Rida, Qasim Amin, Amina Wadud, Farid Esack, Nurkholis Majid, etc. This study examines the religiopolitical context of Muhammad Abduh and Fazlur Rahman in constructing their thoughts - the so-called - Modernism and Neo Modernism, followed by the comparison of both ideas. Through a comparative analysis of both scholars’ thoughts, this paper ends with some results that the Ideas of modernism and neo-modernism brought by Muhammad Abduh and Fazlur Rahman are very relevant to his religiopolitical context and in accordance with the needs of the people of that time. Modernism of the 19th century offered about being responsive to Western progress and sticking to tradition, while neo-modernism presented the response in a more systematic and methodic.
Downloads
References
‘Abduh, M. (1993). Al-A‘māl al-Kāmilah li al-Imām al-Syaikh Muḥammad ‘Abduh (M. ‘Imārah (ed.)). Dār al-Syurūq.
‘Abduh, M. (1994). Risālah al-Tauḥīd (M. ‘Imārah (ed.)). Dār al-Syurūq.
’Abd Al-Rāziq, M. (1946). Muḥammad ‘Abduh. Dār al-Ma‘ārif.
Abbas, M. B. (2017). Between Western Academia and Pakistan: Fazlur Rahman and the fight for fusionism. Modern Asian Studies, 51(3), 736–768. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0026749X15000517
Abidin, Z. (2015). Formasi dan Rekonstruksi Politik Islam Abad 19. Tasâmuh, 13(1), 1–22.
Adams, C. C. (1968). Islam and Modernism in Egypt : a Study of the Modern Reform Movement Inaugurated by Muhammad `Abduh. Russell & Russell.
Ahmad Amir Aziz. (2009). Pembaharuan Teologi: Perspektif Modernisme Muhammad Abduh dan Neo-Modernisme Fazlur Rahman. Penerbit Teras.
Ahmad N. Amir, Abdi O. Shuriye, A. F. I. (2012). Muhammad Abduh’s Contributions to Modernity. Asian Journal of Management Sciences and Education, 1(1).
Ahmed, A. M. (2017). The Theological Thought of Fazlur Rahman: A Modern Mutakallim. Islamic Book Trust.
Akbar, A. (2020). Fazlur Rahman’s Influence on Contemporary Islamic Thought. The Muslim World, 110(2), 129–153. https://doi.org/10.1111/muwo.12334
Al-Afghānī, J. al-D. (2000). Al-A‘māl al-Kāmilah li Jamāl al-Dīn al-Afghānī (H. Khaṣraṣāhī (ed.)). Al-Majma‘ al-‘Ālamī li al-Taqrīb baina al-Mażāhib al-Islāmiyyah.
Ali, N. G. H. (2018). Concept of Shūra in Fazlur Rahman’s Political Ideas at Practical Level. Journal of Islamic Thought and Civilization, 08(02), 110–126. https://doi.org/10.32350/jitc.82.07
Amin, H., & Rauf, A. (2021). Islamic Revivalism and Its Internal Critics in the Indo-Pak Subcontinent. Hamdard Islamicus, 39(3 SE-Articles). https://hamdardislamicus.com.pk/index.php/hi/article/view/108
Amīn, U. (1944). Muḥammad ‘Abduh. Dār Ajyā’ al-Kutub al-‘Arabiyyah.
Bektovic, S. (2016a). Towards a neo-modernist Islam. Studia Theologica - Nordic Journal of Theology, 70(2), 160–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/0039338X.2016.1253260
Bektovic, S. (2016b). Towards a Neo-modernist Islam. Studia Theologica - Nordic Journal of Theology, 70(2), 160–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/0039338X.2016.1253260
Botman, S. (1998). The liberal age, 1923–1952. In The Cambridge History of Egypt (pp. 285–308). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521472111.013
Daly, M. W. (Ed.). (1998). The Cambridge History of Egypt. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521472111
Dunyā, S. (1958). Al-Syaikh Muḥammad ‘Abduh baina al-Falāsifah wa al-Kalāmiyyīn. ‘Īsā al-Bābi al-Ḥalabī.
Fahmy, K. (1998). The era of Muhammad ’Ali Pasha, 1805–1848. In The Cambridge History of Egypt (pp. 139–179). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521472111.007
Gibb, H. A. R. (1947). Modern trends in Islam. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 67(3).
Hitti, P. K. (1970). History of the Arabs. Macmillan Education UK. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15402-9
Hourani, A. (1983). Arabic Thought in the Liberal Age 1798–1939. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801990
Hunter, F. R. (1998). Egypt under the successors of Muhammad ’Ali. In The Cambridge History of Egypt (pp. 180–197). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521472111.008
Hunter, S., & Hunter, S. T. (2014). Reformist Voices of Islam: Mediating Islam and Modernity. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315701233
Iqbal, M. (1977). Speeches, Writings, and Statements of Iqbal (A. Sherwani (Ed.); 2nd ed.). Iqbal Academy.
Iqbal, M. (2012). The Reconstruction of Religious Thought in Islam. Stanford University Press.
Jackson, R. (2006). Fifty Key Figures in Islam. In Fifty Key Figures in Islam. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203001387
Jan, T. (1998). Pakistan between Secelarism and Islam: Ideology, Issues & Conflict. Institute of Policy Studies.
Lawrence, Z. (1997). Pakistan in the Twentieth Century : A Political History. Oxford University Press.
Lee, R. D. (2018). Overcoming Tradition and Modernity. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429498527
Mehdi, R. (2013). The Islamization of the Law in Pakistan (RLE Politics of Islam). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203381298
Metcalf, B. (2004). Islamic Contestations : Essays on Muslims in India and Pakistan. Oxford University Press.
Muhammad Khalid Masud, A. R. N. and S. H. N. (1988). In Memorium : Dr . Fazlur Rahman ( 1919-1988 ). Islamic Studies, 27(4), 390–400.
Nasr, S. V. R. (2001). The Islamic Leviathan. Oxford University PressNew York. https://doi.org/10.1093/0195144260.001.0001
Nasution, H. (1968). The Place of Reason in ’Abduh’s Theology: Its Impact on His Theological System and Views. McGill University.
Nuning Hasanah. (2013). Intelektualisme Islam Abad Pertengahan: Sebaran Karya-karya Kepustakaan Islam. At-Tarbawi, 12(1).
Rahman, F. (1958). Prophecy in Islam: Philosophy and Orthodoxy. George Allen & Unwin.
Rahman, Fazlur. (1975). The Philosophy of Mullā Ṣadrā (Ṣadr Al-Dīn Al-Shirāzī). State University of New York Press.
Rahman, Fazlur. (1979). Islam. The University of Chicago Press.
Rahman, Fazlur. (2000). Revival and Reform in Islam: A Study of Islamic Fundamentalism. Oneworld.
Rahman, Fazlur. (2009a). Islamic Methodology in History. IRI IIU Islamabad Pakistan.
Rahman, Fazlur. (2009b). Major Themes of the Qur’an (2nd ed.). The University of Chicago Press.
Rahman, Fazlur. (2011). Prophecy in Islam: Philosophy and Orthodoxy. The Chicago University Press.
Riḍā, M. R. (n.d.). Tārīkh al-Ustāż al-Imām al-Syaikh Muḥammad ‘Abduh. Al-Manār.
Scharbrodt, O. (2022). Muhammad ‘Abduh: Modern Islam and the Culture of Ambiguity. Bloomsbury.
Sedgwick, M. (2014). Muhammad Abduh. Oneworld.
Sibawaihi, S. (2021). Epistemologizing the Islamic Concept of Resurrection in the Hereafter: A Comparative Study Between al-Ghazālī and Fazlur Rahman. Jurnal Akidah & Pemikiran Islam, 23(2), 275–310. https://doi.org/10.22452/afkar.vol23no2.8
Syalāsy, ‘Alī. (1987). Silsilah al-A‘māl al-Majhūlah Muḥammad ‘Abduh. Al-Rayyis.
Usman, A. H., Abdullah, M. F. R., Abdul Kadir, M. N., & Iskandar, A. (2022). The Concept of an Ideal Society: A Review of Fazlur Rahman’s Perspective. International Journal of Islamic Thought, 6, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.24035/ijit.21.2022.220
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
This ejournal system and its contents are licensed under
a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
