Peer-Reviewers

Abdul Karim, (SCOPUS ID: 57196185152), UIN Walisongo Semarang, Indonesia

Agus Wahyu Triatmo, (SCOPUS ID:57226894008), Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia

Akhmad Anwar Dani, (SCOPUS ID: 57220007270), UIN Raden Mas Said Surakarta, Indonesia

Ahmad Izudin, (SCOPUS ID: 57202765313) UIN Sunan Kalijaga Sunan Kalijaga, Indonesia

Ahmad Hidayatullah, UIN K.H. Abdurahman Wahid Pekalongan, Indonesia

Dyah Fitria Kartika, Universitas Tadulako, Indonesia

Rifqi Fairuz, UIN Salatiga, Indonesia

Okta Nurul Hidayati, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Kirana Nur Lyansari, UIN Walisongo Semarang, Indonesia

Abraham Zakky Zulhazmi, UIN Raden Mas Said Surakarta, Indonesia

Rama Kertamukti, UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Miftahur Ridho, UIN Sultan Aji Muhammad Idris Samarinda, Indonesia

Rhesa Zuhriya Briyan Pratiwi, UIN Raden Mas Said, Indonesia

Peer reviewers should :

  1. Only agree to review manuscripts for which they have the subject expertise required to carry out a proper assessment and which they can assess in a timely manner.
  2. Respect the confidentiality of peer review and not reveal any details of a manuscript or its review, during or after the peer-review process, beyond those that are released by the journal.
  3. Not use information obtained during the peer-review process for their own or any other person's or organization's advantage, or to disadvantage or discredit others.
  4. Declare all potential conflicting interests, seeking advice from the journal if they are unsure whether something constitutes a relevant interest
  5. Not allow their reviews to be influenced by the origins of a manuscript, by the nationality, religious or political beliefs, gender or other characteristics of the authors.
  6. Be objective and constructive in their reviews, refraining from being hostile or inflammatory and from making libelous or derogatory personal comments.
  7. Acknowledge that peer review is largely a reciprocal endeavor and undertake to carry out their fair share of reviewing and in a timely manner
  8. Provide journals with personal and professional information that is accurate and a true representation of their expertise
  9. Recognize that impersonation of another individual during the review process is considered serious misconduct