Al-A'raf : Jurnal Pemikiran Islam dan Filsafat
Full Lenght Article
MENCARI KEBENARAN DI DALAM SAINS Kajian atas Gagasan Ian G. Barbour dalam Buku Issues in Science and Religion
Abstract
Abstract: This article tries to describe the main idea of
Barbour‟s work on Issues in Science and Religion related to scientific
methods. According to Barbour, three criteria are used to evaluate a
theory: it should match with observations, the internal relationship
between the theories and concepts, and its comprehension. Barbour
outlines some views in relation to the theory of science tradition. There
are four views, all of which have differences to apply the theory in the
study of science, namely positivism, instrumentalism, Idealism, and
Realism. Models of scientific discovery do not only give blessing for
human life, but also a challenge for religious philosophical outlook.
Scientific thoughts will be also able to open the forms of truth that lies
in the sphere of personal life and human relationships
Keywords
Declarations
Publisher's Note
UIN Raden Mas Said Surakarta remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
Dialog Sains dan Agama†Pengantar dalam Keth Ward,
Dan Tuhanpun Tidak Bermain Dadu, terj. Larasmoyo.
Bandung: Mizan, 2002.
Bagir, Zainal Abidin. “Riwayat Barbour, Riwayat “Sains dan Agamaâ€â€,
Pengantar dalam Juru Bicara Tuhan, terj. E.R. Muhammad.
Bandung: Mizan, 2002.
Bagus, Lorens. Kamus Filsafat. Jakarta: Gramedia, 2003.
Barbour, Ian G. “Tanggapan atas tulisan Huston Smith berjudul Why
Religion Matters†dalam Smith. Lihat dalam Huston
Smith, Ajal Agama di Tengah Kedigdayaan Sains?.
Barbour, Ian G. Issues in Science and Religion. London: Harper
Torchbook, 1971.
Smith, Huston. Ajal Agama di Tengah Kedigdayaan Sains?, terj. Ary
Budiyanto. Bandung: Mizan, 2003.
Verhaak, C dan R. Haryono Imam. Filsafat Ilmu Pengetahuan. Jakarta:
Gramedia, 1997.
Bibliographic Information
