Al-A'raf : Jurnal Pemikiran Islam dan Filsafat
Full Lenght Article
REPRODUKSI PEMAHAMAN DAN DINAMIKA PSIKOLOGIS PAHAM RADIKAL: ANALISIS TERHADAP SIKAP ‘MENYALAHKAN’ KELOMPOK LAIN
Abstract
The study aims to find out the psychological dimension of Islamic radical group attitudes which are easily ‘blaming’ the other group that having different idea from his group. Based on the observation method to the individual that having religious radical understanding (especially to the individual/group that usually blaming the other group that having different understanding, as heresy (bid’ah), syirik, infidel (kafir), and deviate) on the range year of 2008 – 2017, which then comprehend with the various literatures correlated to the main problem of research, the study revealed that Islamic radical group having psychological problem in term of their mindset and perception, which then affected to their attitudes and behaviors. Hereby, in the certain level those psychological problems directed them to the violent actions. Â
Keywords
Declarations
Publisher's Note
UIN Raden Mas Said Surakarta remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
Bakri, Syamsul. “Islam Dan Wacana Radikalisme Agama Kontemporer.†Dinika: Journal of Islamic Studies 3, no. 1 (2004): 3–4.
DeVito, J.A. Komunikasi Antarmanusia. Tangerang: Karisma Publishing Group, 2011.
Idahram, Syaikh. Mereka Memalsukan Kitab Kitab Karya Ulama Klasik : Episode Kebohongan Publik Sekte Salafi Wahabi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pesantren, 2011.
———. Sejarah Berdarah Sekte Salafi Wahabi: Mereka Membunuh Semuanya, Termasuk Pada Ulama. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pesantren, 2011.
———. Ulama Sejagat Menggugat Salafi Wahabi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pesantren, 2011.
Jess Feist, Gregory J. Feist, Tomi-Ann Roberts. Teori Kepribadian : Theoris of Personality Jilid 2 (Penterjemah : RA Hadwitia Dewi Pertiwi). Jakarta: Salemba Humanika, 2017.
Kafid, Nur. “Ma’had Sebagai Role Model De-Radikalisasi.†DINIKA: Journal of Islamic Studies 13, no. 2 (2015): 21–33. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303406893_MA%27HAD_SEBAGAI_ROLE_MODEL_DE-RADIKALISASI.
Milla, M.N. “Bias Heuristik Dalam Proses Penilaian Dan Pengambilan Strategi Terorisme.†Psikologi 1, no. 1 (2005): 9–21.
Moghaddam. “F. M. Staircase to Terrorism: A Psychological Exploration.†American Psychologist 60, no. 2 (2005): 161–169.
Muslim, Ikhsanul Amal. “Gerakan Situs Radikalisme Dan Sosial Media.†Ipnu.or.id. Last modified 2016. Accessed June 11, 2017.
Purnama, Fahmy Farid. “KHAWARIJISME : PERGULATAN POLITIK.†Al-A’raf: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam dan Filsafat XIII, no. 2 (2016): 213–232.
Ramli, Muhammad Idrus. Madzhab Al-Asy’ari, Smith, C.M., Tindale, R., dan Dugoni, B.L. “Minority and Majority Influence in Freely Interacting Groups : Qualitative Versus Quantitative Differnces.†British Journal of Social Psychology 35 (1996): 137–149.
Supratiknya. Tunjauan Psikologis Komunikasi Antarpribadi. Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 2016.
Bibliographic Information
