SOCIAL CRITICISM IN THE SHORT STORY SCREAMING GRAVES BY KHALIL GIBRAN (A SOCIO-LITERARY ANALYSIS STUDY BY ALAN SWINGEWOOD)

Authors

  • Muhammad Faruqi Abdurrasyid UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22515/allais.v3i1.9452

Keywords:

literary sociology, Alan Swingewood, social criticism, social documents

Abstract

The research is entitled “Social criticism in the short story Screaming Graves by Khalil Gibran (A socio-literary analysis study by Alan Swingewood)”. The aims of this research are: First, to find out the substance of the short story Shurakh al Qubur. Second, to find out the social criticism conveyed by the author in the short story. Third, to find out the relationship between the short story Shurakh al Qubur and the social conditions of Lebanese society. In order to analyze the social criticism in the short story, the researcher used Alan Swingewood's literary sociology theory. Swingewood believes that literary works are a reflection of the social conditions in which they were created. In principle, there are three things related to the sociology of literature, namely first, research that views literary works as social documents in which they are a reflection of the situation at the time the literature was created. Second, research that reveals literature as a reflection of the author's social situation. Third, research that captures literature as a manifestation of historical events and socio-cultural conditions. In this study, researchers used the first perspective, namely literary works as social documents. This research produces first, the substance of the short story Shurakh al Qubur which explains that this short story is the author's criticism of the government which is described through the story between the king and the suspect. Second, criticism of authoritarian leaders in power and criticism of autocratic government systems. Third, social criticism in the short story which reflects the conditions of the Ottoman Empire during the leadership of Sultan Abdul Hamid II. This criticism is represented in the figure of a king who is cruel in punishing his people.

References

خليل جبران، جبران. ١٩٠٨. الأرواح المتمرّدة ، القاهرة: دار العرب للبستانى.

صالح الشنطي، محمد. 1992. الأدب العربي الحديث، حائل: دار الأندلس للنشر والتوزيع.

طرابلسي، فواز. 2008. تاريخ لبنان الحديث، بيروت: رياض الريس للكتب والنشر.

القوّال، أنطوان. ١٩٩٤. المجموعة الكاملة لمألّفات جبران خليل جبران، إشكندارية: جميع الحقوق محفوظة لدار الجيل.

نعيمه، ميخائيل. 2009. جبران خليل جبران، بيروت: نوفل.

Abdullah, Taufik, 2002 .Dkk. Ensiklopedi Tematis Dunia Islam Jilid II: Khilafah, Jakarta: PT Ichtiar Baru Van Hoeve.

Arifah, N. N., & Gamasari, R. (2023). تحليل الصراعات الاجتماعية في رواية حارة اليهود : دم لفطير صهيون لنجيب الكيلاني من خلل نظرية لويس كوزر. 2(2)، 55–72ALLAIS Journal of Arabic Language and Literature, 2 (2), 55–72

Aula, M. (2022). شعر"دع الأيام" في ديوان الإمام الشافعى (دراسة تحليلية السيميائية لشارلز موريس) ALLAIS Journal of Arabic Language and Literature, 1(1), 84–98.

Alan Popp, Richard. 2001 .Al-Rabithah al-Qolamiyah 1916, “Journal of Arabic Literature (Vol. 32, No.1, 2001)”, Brill.

Aslan, Yasin. 2009. Transformation of Turkish Criminal Law from Ottoman-Islamic Law to The Civil Law Tradition, Ankara bar review.

Bahrui, Suheil, 2000. Jenkins Joe. Kahlil Gibran Man adn Poet Biografi Terbaru. Terjemahan Nin Bakdisoumanto, Jakarta: PT Gramedia Widya Sarana Indonesia.

Cowdhury, Rashed. 2011. Pan-Islamism and Modernisation During the Reign of Sultan Abdülhamid II, 1876-1909, Thesis, Montreal: McGill University.

Endraswara, Suwardi. 2003. Metodologi Penelitian Sastra: Episemologi, Model, Teori, dan Aplikasi, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Widyatama.

Faruk. 2005. Pengantar Sosiologi Sastra., Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Ghougassian, Joseph Peter. 2004. Sayap-Sayap Pemikiran Kahlil Gibran, Yogyakarta: Fajar Pustaka Baru.

Gunday, Husein, 2015. Sahin, Sener. literary Influences of Gibran Kahlil Gibran,”International Journal of Business and Social Science (Vol. 6. No. 3: March 2015)”,Uludag: Uludag University.

Hajjar, Nijmeh. 2010. The Politics and poetics of Ameen Rihani, London: Tauris Publisher.

Kutha Ratna, Nyoman. 2003. Teori, Metode dan Teknik Penelitian Sastra, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Laurenson, Diana, 1972. Alan Swingewood. The Sociology of Literature, London: Paladin.

Ma’wa, U. Q., & Farma, T. W. (2023). تحليل الصراع الباطني للشخصية الرئيسية في رواية الحب الضائع لطه حسين (الدراسة سيكولوجي الأدب) ALLAIS Journal of Arabic Language and Literature, 2 (2), 27–39.

Mangunhardjana, A. 2006. Isme-Isme dalam Etika dari A sampai Z, Yogyakarta: Kanisisus.

Nurgiyantoro, Burhan. 1995. Teori Pengkajian Fiksi, Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Paul Nassar, Eugene. 1980. Cultural Discontuinity in The Works of Kahlil Gibran, “Oxford Journal”, Society for the Study of the Multi-Ethnic Literature of the United States (MELUS)”, (Vol. 7, No.2, 1980), Oxford University Press.

Soekanto, Soejono. 2005. Sosiologi: Suatu Pengantar, Jakarta: PT. Raja Gravindo Persada.

Soetomo. 2010. Masalah Sosial dan Upaya Pemecahannya, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Wahyudi, Tri. 2013. Sosiologi Sastra Alan Swingewood Sebuah Teori, “Jurnal Poetika (Vol. 1 2013)”, Yogyakarta: UGM.

Downloads

Published

2024-07-01

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check