Philippines teachers' beliefs on digital teaching competence in post-pandemic recovery: Still prefer online?

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22515/jemin.v1i2.4287

Keywords:

digital teaching competence, post-pandemic teaching, teachers’ beliefs

Abstract

As the effect of school closure following the coronavirus lockdowns, the use of virtual classrooms has extremely rocketed to replace face-to-face school interaction. This change has resulted in new habits and adaptation in methods and approaches of teaching, particularly in the era of post pandemic recovery. This study is based on the phenomena occurred in most of school environments where digital (online) teaching practices become a new habit for teachers and students. A question that may arise is “do they still prefer online after the pandemic?†Drawing on this issue, this study aims to examine the beliefs of Philippines junior high schools teachers on digital teaching competence and to explore their preferences on teaching methods (online or offline) in post pandemic recovery. This study utilized a discovery-oriented qualitative approach, bridging into personal narrative and ethnographic perspective by involving twelve teachers teaching at several junior high schools in Davao Philippines. The results revealed that the teachers’ beliefs mattered in terms of digital platforms (tools) and classroom activities. The results further depicted that their acquisition of digital teaching competence greatly depended on teacher professional development programs and individual trainings. Moreover, this study also discussed the teachers’ preferences on the model of teaching either online or offline after the schools is opened. The results of this study contribute to providing valuable insights into redefining the situation of teaching and learning process in the era of post pandemic recovery.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aliyyah, R. R., Rachmadtullah, R., Samsudin, A., Syaodih, E., Nurtanto, M., & Tambunan, A. R. S. (2020). The perceptions of primary school teachers of online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic period: A case study in Indonesia. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 7(2), 90–109. http://dx.doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/388

An, Y.-J., & Reigeluth, C. (2011). Creating technology-enhanced, learner-centered classrooms: K–12 teachers’ beliefs, perceptions, barriers, and support needs. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 28(2), 54–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2011.10784681

Bai, J., Li, C., & Yeh, W.-C. (2019). Integrating technology in the teaching of advanced Chinese. Journal of Technology and Chinese Language Teaching, 10(1), 73–90.

Bali, S., & Liu, M. C. (2018). Students’ perceptions toward online learning and face-to-face learning courses. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1108(1), 12094.

Birello, M. (2012). Teacher cognition and language teacher education: Beliefs and practice. A conversation with Simon Borg. Bellaterra Journal of Teaching & Learning Language & Literature, 5(2), 88–94.

Borg, S. (2015). Teacher cognition and language education: Research and practice. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Chung, E., Subramaniam, G., & Dass, L. C. (2020). Online learning readiness among university students in Malaysia amidst COVID-19. Asian Journal of University Education, 16(2), 46–58.

Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551

Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers and Education, 59(2), 423–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.001

Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., & Tondeur, J. (2015). Teachers’ beliefs and uses of technology to support 21st-century teaching and learning. International Handbook of Research on Teacher Beliefs, 403.

Fakhruddin, Z., Usman, U., Rahmawati, R., & Sulvinajayanti, S. (2020). Designing English Listening Materials through YouTube Video Editing: Training for English Teachers of Islamic Junior High Schools, Parepare, South Sulawesi. IJELTAL (Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics), 4(2), 275–290.

Flack, C. B., Walker, L., Bickerstaff, A., & Margetts, C. (2020). Socioeconomic disparities in Australian schooling during the COVID-19 pandemic. Melbourne, Australia: Pivot Professional Learning.

Galvis, H. A. (2012). Understanding Beliefs, Teachers’ Beliefs and Their Impact on the Use of Computer Technology. Profile Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 14(2), 95–112.

Gjelaj, M., Buza, K., Shatri, K., & Zabeli, N. (2020). Digital technologies in early childhood: Attitudes and practices of parents and teachers in Kosovo. International Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13111a

Ivone, F. M., Jacobs, G. M., & Renandya, W. A. (2020). Far apart, yet close together: Cooperative learning in online education. Studies in English Language and Education, 7(2), 271–289. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v7i2.17285

Juryatina, J., & Amrin, A. (2021). Students’ interest in Arabic language learning: the roles of teacher. Journal of Educational Management and Instruction (JEMIN), 1(1), 40-49. https://doi.org/10.22515/jemin.v1i1.3459

Kamal, A. A., Shaipullah, N. M., Truna, L., Sabri, M., & Junaini, S. N. (2020). Transitioning to online learning during COVID-19 Pandemic: Case study of a Pre-University Centre in Malaysia. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 11(6), 217-213.

Kays, K. M., Keith, T. L., & Broughal, M. T. (2013). Best practice in online survey research with sensitive topics. In Advancing research methods with new technologies (pp. 157–168). IGI Global.

Klimova, B. (2019). Impact of mobile learning on students’ achievement results. Education Sciences, 9(2), 90-103. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9020090

Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Cain, W. (2013). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Journal of Education, 193(3), 13–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741319300303

List, A. (2019). Defining digital literacy development: An examination of pre-service teachers’ beliefs. Computers & Education, 138, 146–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.03.009

Mahmood, S. (2021). Instructional strategies for online teaching in COVID‐19 pandemic. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 3(1), 199–203. https://publons.com/publon/10.1002/hbe2.218.

Mailizar, A., Abdulsalam, M., & Suci, B. (2020). Secondary school mathematics teachers’ views on e-learning implementation barriers during the COVID-19 pandemic: The case of Indonesia. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 16(7), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/8240

Makruf, I., Choiriyah, S., Putra, H. R. P., & Nugroho, A. (2021). Flipped Learning and Communicative Competence: An Experimental Study of English Learners. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 9(4), 571–584. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.1960

Marchand, G. C., & Gutierrez, A. P. (2012). The role of emotion in the learning process: Comparisons between online and face-to-face learning settings. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(3), 150–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.10.001

Miller, B., & Morris, R. G. (2016). Virtual peer effects in social learning theory. Crime & Delinquency, 62(12), 1543–1569. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128714526499

Mutiaraningrum, I., & Nugroho, A. (2020). Social construction of knowledge in synchronous text-based discussion during English language learning. Journal on English as a Foreign Language, 10(2), 315–336. https://doi.org/10.23971/jefl.v10i2.1934

Nartiningrum, N., & Nugroho, A. (2021). English teachers’ perspectives on challenges, suggestions, and materials of online teaching amidst the global pandemic. IJEE (Indonesian Journal of English Education), 1(1), 101–119.

Nuankaew, W., & Nuankaew, P. (2021). Educational Engineering for Models of Academic Success in Thai Universities During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Learning Strategies for Lifelong Learning. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 11(4).

Nugroho, A. & Mutiaraningrum, I. (2020). EFL teachers ’ beliefs and practices about digital learning of English. EduLite Journal of English Education, Literature and Culture, 5(2), 304–321. http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/e.5.2.304-321

Nugroho, A., Haghegh, M., & Triana, Y. (2021). Emergency Remote Teaching amidst Global Pandemic: Voices of Indonesian EFL Teachers. VELES Voices of English Language Education Society, 5(1), 66–80. https://doi.org/10.29408/veles%20journal.v5i1.3258

Nugroho, A., & Rahmawati, A. (2020). “Let’s Write a Caption!”: Utilizing Instagram to Enhance ESP Students’ Writing Skills. Jurnal Basis (Bahasa dan Sastra Inggris), 7(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.33884/basisupb.v7i1.1782

O’Neal, L. J., Gibson, P., & Cotten, S. R. (2017). Elementary school teachers’ beliefs about the role of technology in 21st-century teaching and learning. Computers in the Schools, 34(3), 192–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2017.1347443

Pei, L., & Wu, H. (2019). Does online learning work better than offline learning in undergraduate medical education? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medical Education Online, 24(1), 1666538. https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2019.1666538

Sadaf, A., & Johnson, B. L. (2017). Teachers’ beliefs about integrating digital literacy into classroom practice: An investigation based on the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 33(4), 129–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2017.1347534

Setyawan, H. (2019). Blended Method: Online-Offline Teaching And Learning, On Students’ Reading Achievement. English Education: Jurnal Tadris Bahasa Inggris, 12(1), 22–33. https://doi.org/10.24042/ee-jtbi.v12i1.4432

Slim, H., & Hafedh, M. (2019). Social media impact on language learning for specific purposes: A study in English for business administration. Teaching English with Technology, 19(1), 56–71.

Specht, D., Chatterton, P., Hartley, P., & Saunders, G. (2021). Developing Belief in Online Teaching: Efficacy and digital transformation. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 9(2), 68–76. https://doi.org/10.14297/jpaap.v9i2.486

Sundberg, B., Spante, M., & Stenlund, J. (2012). Disparity in practice: diverse strategies among teachers implementing interactive whiteboards into teaching practice in two Swedish primary schools. Learning, Media and Technology, 37(3), 253–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2011.586352

Van, D. T. H., & Thi, H. H. Q. (2021). Student Barriers to Prospects of Online Learning in Vietnam in The Context of Covid-19 Pandemic. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 22(3), 110–123. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.961824

Wahyuningsih, E., & Baidi, B. (2021). Scrutinizing the potential use of Discord application as a digital platform amidst emergency remote learning. Journal of Educational Management and Instruction (JEMIN), 1(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.22515/jemin.v1i1.3448

Webb, M., & Doman, E. (2020). Impacts of flipped classrooms on learner attitudes towards technology-enhanced language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(3), 240–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1557692

Yin, R. K. (2015). Qualitative research from start to finish. Guilford publications.

Zhang, C. (2020). From face-to-face to screen-to-screen: CFL teachers’ beliefs about digital teaching competence during the pandemic. International Journal of Chinese Language Teaching, 1(1), 35–52.

Downloads

Submitted

2021-10-31

Accepted

2021-12-30

Published

2021-12-30

How to Cite

Alcontin, T. N. (2021). Philippines teachers’ beliefs on digital teaching competence in post-pandemic recovery: Still prefer online?. Journal of Educational Management and Instruction (JEMIN), 1(2), 71–82. https://doi.org/10.22515/jemin.v1i2.4287

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 2: December 2021

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2021 Tyzl N. Alcontin

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright
Copyright aims to protect the specific way the article has been written to describe an experiment and the results. Journal of Educational Management and Instruction is committed to its authors to protect and defend their work and their reputation and takes allegations of infringement, plagiarism, ethical disputes, and fraud very seriously. Automotive Experiences is published under the terms of the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0). Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication (online and print) with the work simultaneously. We use the restrictive license (non-commercial) as follows:

BY (attribution): Users are allowed to share, distribute and redistribute the published article in any medium or format, with an identification of the authors and its initial publication in this journal. Authors are encouraged to post and distribute their articles immediately after publication (e.g., institutional or public repositories, personal websites). Authors are allowed to enter into additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published and an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.

NC (non-commercial): Users are not allowed to use the article commercially without the permission of the authors. Authors agree explicitly that the published article is indexed worldwide in databases, repositories and indexation services, even if these services operate on a commercial basis. Authors grant Journal of Educational Management and Instruction explicit the right to include the published articles in databases, repositories and indexation services.

License

License to Publish
The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0). The author hereby grants Journal of Educational Management and Instruction an exclusive publishing and distribution license in the manuscript include tables, illustrations or other material submitted for publication as part of the manuscript (the “Article”) in print, electronic and all other media (whether now known or later developed), in any form, in all languages, throughout the world, for the full term of copyright, and the right to license others to do the same, effective when the article is accepted for publication. This license includes the right to enforce the rights granted hereunder against third parties.

Author's Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).

User Rights
Under the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, the author(s) and users are free to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material). Users must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made.

Rights of Authors
Authors retain the following rights:

  1. Copyright, and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
  2. The right to use the substance of the article in future own works, including lectures and books,
  3. The right to reproduce the article for own purposes, provided the copies are not offered for sale, and
  4. The right to self-archive the article.

Co-authorship
If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.