Flipping the classroom to promote higher order thinking skill: A case of Chinese undergraduate students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22515/jemin.v1i2.4301Keywords:
flipped learning, higher order thinking skill, quasi-experimental designAbstract
Flipped learning approach has recently gained much more attention and has widely been utilized as a new approach to assist student-centered learning activities across different contexts of teaching. The present study aims to examine the effect of flipped learning instruction on undergraduate students’ development of higher order thinking skills (HOTS). Drawing on a quasi-experimental design, this study recruited 70 Chinese science education students enrolled in ‘teaching with technology’ course; they were equally divided into flipped (experiment) and non-flipped (control) groups. Data were obtained from pre-tests and post-tests in both groups using a higher order thinking skill test, and were analyzed by means of sample t-test using IBM-SPSS version 24. The results showed that flipped group students outperformed the non-flipped students in terms of HOTS performance. There was a significant different between the results of flipped group students’ pre-test and post-test scores (p-value: 0.000 < 0.05). It suggests that the flipped learning instruction has a significant effect on the Chinese undergraduate students’ HOTS development. This study contributes to providing valuable insights for instructors and college curricula designers to incorporate flipped learning approach in teaching at university level.
Downloads
References
Al Mamun, M. A., Azad, M. A. K., & Boyle, M. (2021). Review of flipped learning in engineering education: Scientific mapping and research horizon. Education and Information Technologies, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10630-z
Annan, D. K., Onodipe, D. G., & Stephenson, D. A. (2019). Using Student-Created Content Videos in Flipped Learning to Enhance Student Higher-Order Thinking Skills, Engagement, and Satisfaction. Journal of Education & Social Policy, 6(3), 22–31. https://doi.org/10.30845/jesp.v6n3p4
Apino, E., & Retnawati, H. (2017). Developing instructional design to improve mathematical higher order thinking skills of students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 812(1), 12100.
Baepler, P., Walker, J. D., & Driessen, M. (2014). It’s not about seat time: Blending, flipping, and efficiency in active learning classrooms. Computers & Education, 78(September), 227–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.06.006
Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. International society for technology in education.
Birgili, B., Seggie, F. N., & Oğuz, E. (2021). The trends and outcomes of flipped learning research between 2012 and 2018: A descriptive content analysis. Journal of Computers in Education, 8(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-021-00183-y
Bredow, C. A., Roehling, P. V, Knorp, A. J., & Sweet, A. M. (2021). To flip or not to flip? A meta-analysis of the efficacy of flipped learning in higher education. Review of Educational Research, 91(6), 878-918. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543211019122
Brewer, R., & Movahedazarhouligh, S. (2018). Successful stories and conflicts: A literature review on the effectiveness of flipped learning in higher education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(4), 409–416. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12250
Chen Hsieh, J. S., Wu, W.-C. V., & Marek, M. W. (2017). Using the flipped classroom to enhance EFL learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2015.1111910.
Cook, T. D. (2015). Quasi‐experimental design. Wiley Encyclopedia of Management.
Dimitrios, B., Labros, S., Nikolaos, K., Koutiva, M., & Athanasios, K. (2013). Traditional teaching methods vs. teaching through the application of information and communication technologies in the accounting field: Quo Vadis? European Scientific Journal, 9(28). 73-101.
Ekici, M. (2021). A systematic review of the use of gamification in flipped learning. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10394-y
Hajibaba, M., Radmehr, F., & Alamolhodaei, H. (2013). A psychological model for mathematical problem solving based on revised Bloom taxonomy for high school girl students. Research in Mathematical Education, 17(3), 199–220.
Hinojo Lucena, F. J., Lopez Belmonte, J., Fuentes Cabrera, A., Trujillo Torres, J. M., & Pozo Sanchez, S. (2020). Academic effects of the use of flipped learning in physical education. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(1), 276. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17010276
Huang, B., Hew, K. F., & Lo, C. K. (2019). Investigating the effects of gamification-enhanced flipped learning on undergraduate students’ behavioral and cognitive engagement. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(8), 1106–1126. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1495653
Hugerat, M., & Kortam, N. (2014). Improving higher order thinking skills among freshmen by teaching science through inquiry. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 10(5), 447–454. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1107a
Hung, H.-T. (2015). Flipping the classroom for English language learners to foster active learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(1), 81–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.967701
Hwang, G. J., Yin, C., & Chu, H. C. (2019). The era of flipped learning: promoting active learning and higher order thinking with innovative flipped learning strategies and supporting systems. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(8), 991–994. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1667150
Jamaludin, R., & Osman, S. Z. M. (2014). The use of a flipped classroom to enhance engagement and promote active learning. Journal of Education and Practice, 5(2), 124–131.
Jdaitawi, M. (2020). Does flipped learning promote positive emotions in science education? A comparison between traditional and flipped classroom approaches. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 18(6), 516-524. https://doi.org/10.34190/JEL.18.6.004
Karaca, C., & Ocak, M. A. (2017). Effects of Flipped Learning on University Students’ Academic Achievement in Algorithms and Programming Education. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 9(2). 527-543.
Katchamat, P. (2018). The Effect of Flipped Classroom Instruction on Appropriacy of English Apology by Thai EFL Learners. International Journal of Pedagogy and Teacher Education, 2(2), 13–119.
Kim, N. H., So, H.-J., & Joo, Y. J. (2021). Flipped learning design fidelity, self-regulated learning, satisfaction, and continuance intention in a university flipped learning course. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 37(4), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.6046
Lee, J., Lee, Y., Gong, S., Bae, J., & Choi, M. (2016). A meta-analysis of the effects of non-traditional teaching methods on the critical thinking abilities of nursing students. BMC Medical Education, 16(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0761-7
Lee, J. S., & Drajati, N. A. (2019). English as an international language beyond the ELT classroom. ELT Journal, 73(4), 419–427. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccz018
Lee, K. yuen, & Lai, Y. chi. (2017). Facilitating higher-order thinking with the flipped classroom model: a student teacher’s experience in a Hong Kong secondary school. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 12(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-017-0048-6
Lin, H.-C., Hwang, G.-J., Chang, S.-C., & Hsu, Y.-D. (2021). Facilitating critical thinking in decision making-based professional training: An online interactive peer-review approach in a flipped learning context. Computers & Education, 173(November), 104266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104266
Lo, C. K., & Hew, K. F. (2020). A comparison of flipped learning with gamification, traditional learning, and online independent study: the effects on students’ mathematics achievement and cognitive engagement. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(4), 464–481. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1541910
Makruf, I., Putra, H. R. P., Choiriyah, S., & Nugroho, A. (2021). Flipped Learning and Communicative Competence: An Experimental Study of English Learners. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 9(4), 571–584. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.1960
Masrul, A. C., Shen, Z., Guo, X., Sugihara, K., & Nishino, T. (2019). Feasibility study of mixed reality on education of design and planning students based on Bloom taxonomy. International Journal of Sustainable Society, 11(3), 202–219.
Moreno-Guerrero, A.-J., Romero-Rodriguez, J.-M., Lopez-Belmonte, J., & Alonso-Garcia, S. (2020). Flipped learning approach as educational innovation in water literacy. Water, 12(2), 574. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12020574
Muharom, F., Nugroho, A., & Putra P., H. R. & (2022). Self-directed use of digital devices for out-of-class English learning. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science, and Technology (IJEMST), 10(1), 257-271. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.2245
Nugroho, A. & Rahmawati, A. (2020). "Let's Write a Caption!": Utilizing Instagram to Enhance ESP Students' Writing Skills. Jurnal BASIS (Bahasa dan Sastra Inggris), 7(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.33884/basisupb.v7i1.1782.
Nugroho, A., Haghegh, M., & Triana, Y. (2021). Emergency Remote Teaching amidst Global Pandemic: Voices of Indonesian EFL Teachers. VELES Voices of English Language Education Society, 5(1), 66-80. https://doi.org/10.29408/veles%20journal.v5i1.3258
O’Flaherty, J., & Phillips, C. (2015). The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review. The Internet and Higher Education, 25, 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.002
Öztürk, M., & Çakıroğlu, Ü. (2021). Flipped learning design in EFL classrooms: implementing self-regulated learning strategies to develop language skills. Smart Learning Environments, 8(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-021-00146-x
Sahin, A., Cavlazoglu, B., & Zeytuncu, Y. E. (2015). Flipping a college calculus course: A case study. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18(3), 142–152. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.18.3.142
Saputri, A. C. (2019). Improving Students’ Critical Thinking Skills in Cell-Metabolism Learning Using Stimulating Higher Order Thinking Skills Model. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 327–342.
Suprapti, S., Nugroho, A., & Putra, H. R. P. (2021). Flipped Learning Instruction to Enhance University Students’ Higher Order Thinking Skills. Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian Dan Kajian Kepustakaan Di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran, 7(2), 261–269. https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v7i2.3320
Triana, Y., & Nugroho, A. (2021). Brief ELT in Digital Classroom for Lazy Creative Lecturers (Option After Post Pandemic Recovery): Lecturers’ Perspectives. Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics, 6(1), 79–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.21462/ijefl.v6i1.343
Van Alten, D. C. D., Phielix, C., Janssen, J., & Kester, L. (2021). Secondary students’ online self-regulated learning during flipped learning: A latent profile analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 118(May), 106676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106676
Wahyuningsih, E., & Baidi, B. (2021). Scrutinizing the potential use of Discord application as a digital platform amidst emergency remote learning. Journal of Educational Management and Instruction (JEMIN), 1(1), 9-18. https://doi.org/10.22515/jemin.v1i1.3448
Wardani, A., & Suharto, T. (2021). Optimizing the role of informal learning in the perspective of Islamic education during the Covid-19 pandemic. Journal of Educational Management and Instruction (JEMIN), 1(1), 28-39. https://doi.org/10.22515/jemin.v1i1.3456
Webb, M., & Doman, E. (2020). Impacts of flipped classrooms on learner attitudes towards technology-enhanced language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(3), 240–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1557692
Winter, J. W. (2018). Performance and motivation in a middle school flipped learning course. TechTrends, 62(2), 176–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-017-0228-7
Downloads
Submitted
Accepted
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Ariani Selviana Pardosi, Liu Yue Ming
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright
Copyright aims to protect the specific way the article has been written to describe an experiment and the results. Journal of Educational Management and Instruction is committed to its authors to protect and defend their work and their reputation and takes allegations of infringement, plagiarism, ethical disputes, and fraud very seriously. Automotive Experiences is published under the terms of the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0). Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication (online and print) with the work simultaneously. We use the restrictive license (non-commercial) as follows:
BY (attribution): Users are allowed to share, distribute and redistribute the published article in any medium or format, with an identification of the authors and its initial publication in this journal. Authors are encouraged to post and distribute their articles immediately after publication (e.g., institutional or public repositories, personal websites). Authors are allowed to enter into additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published and an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
NC (non-commercial): Users are not allowed to use the article commercially without the permission of the authors. Authors agree explicitly that the published article is indexed worldwide in databases, repositories and indexation services, even if these services operate on a commercial basis. Authors grant Journal of Educational Management and Instruction explicit the right to include the published articles in databases, repositories and indexation services.
License
License to Publish
The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0). The author hereby grants Journal of Educational Management and Instruction an exclusive publishing and distribution license in the manuscript include tables, illustrations or other material submitted for publication as part of the manuscript (the “Articleâ€) in print, electronic and all other media (whether now known or later developed), in any form, in all languages, throughout the world, for the full term of copyright, and the right to license others to do the same, effective when the article is accepted for publication. This license includes the right to enforce the rights granted hereunder against third parties.
Author's Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
User Rights
Under the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, the author(s) and users are free to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material). Users must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made.
Rights of Authors
Authors retain the following rights:
- Copyright, and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
- The right to use the substance of the article in future own works, including lectures and books,
- The right to reproduce the article for own purposes, provided the copies are not offered for sale, and
- The right to self-archive the article.
Co-authorship
If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.