Critical writing in higher education: A need analysis survey
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22515/jemin.v4i1.9146Keywords:
critical writing, English students, learning need analysis, survey researchAbstract
Critical thinking and writing are considered as one of the twenty-first century skills that must be acquired by students; however, research on this area still needs more empirical paucity of evidence. The present study aims to reveal English students’ learning needs on critical writing course at university level. Drawing on survey research, this study invites 437 undergraduate students majoring in English department from four universities in Surakarta municipality, Indonesia. Statistical analysis identifies key student priorities: acquiring, evaluating, and synthesizing information; effective communication; articulating their opinions; publishing their writings; and presenting materials at international forums. The data also reveal that English students encounter significant challenges in critically analyzing information and drawing conclusions from reading passages. Regarding their expectations for critical writing instruction, students aspire to enhance both their critical thinking and academic writing abilities. This is particularly pertinent for pre-service teachers who will need to teach content and produce both academic and non-academic publications. Additionally, the survey indicates a positive student response to incorporating technology (e.g., social media, networking sites, websites) into collaborative learning activities for critical writing courses. These findings provide valuable insights into the needs and expectations of English students regarding critical writing courses, offering a clear direction for course design and instructional strategies.
References
Aloraini, N. (2018). Investigating Instagram as an EFL Learning Tool. Arab World English Journal, 4(4), 174–184. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/call4.13
Anderson, R. C., Chaparro, E. A., Smolkowski, K., & Cameron, R. (2023). Visual thinking and argumentative writing: A social-cognitive pairing for student writing development. Assessing Writing, 55, 100694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2023.100694
Ataç, B. A. (2015). From descriptive to critical writing: A study on the effectiveness of advanced reading and writing instruction. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199, 620–626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.588
Barjesteh, H., & Niknezhad, F. (2020). Fostering critical writing through dialogic teaching: A critical thinking practice among teachers and students. Iranian Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(2), 91–107. https://journalscmu.sinaweb.net/article_109906.html
Biju, L. G., & Vijayakumar, S. (2023). Systematic Review on the Impact of Technology-Supported Writing Environment for Developing Writing Skills. Computer-Assisted Language Learning Electronic Journal, 24(3), 290-313. https://callej.org/index.php/journal/article/view/60
Eady, M. J., Green, C., Akenson, A. B., Supple, B., & ... (2019). Supporting Writing collaborations through synchronous technologies: Singing our SSONG about working together at a distance. Critical Collaborative Communities, BRILL. https://brill.com/downloadpdf/book/9789004410985/BP000027.pdf
Ebadi, S., & Rahimi, M. (2018). An exploration into the impact of WebQuest-based classroom on EFL learners’ critical thinking and academic writing skills: A mixed-methods study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(5–6), 617–651. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1449757
Guo, K., Li, Y., Li, Y., & Chu, S. K. W. (2024). Understanding EFL students’ chatbot-assisted argumentative writing: An activity theory perspective. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12230-5
Hanim, N., Aripin, N., & Lin, N. M. (2020). Exploring the connection between critical thinking skills and academic writing. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 10(2), 118–128. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.1.2020.102.118.128
Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for specific purposes. Cambridge university press.
Isbell, D. R. (2018). Online informal language learning : Insights from a Korean learning community. Language Learning & Technology, 22(3), 82–102. https://doi.org/10125/44658
Joseph, V., Khan, N., Ahmed, S. T., & Malik, M. (2022). Language Learning Through Contemporary Technologies: A Case of TPACK Teaching Model. Multicultural Education, 8(2), 28-36. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5972848
Kang, H. (2022). A study on digital-based argumentative writing in English of South Korean university students. Doctoral Thesis, University College London. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10154753/
Kazemian, M., Irawan, L. A., & Haerazi, H. (2021). Developing Metacognitive Writing Strategy to Enhance Writing Skills Viewed from Prospective Teachers’ Critical Thinking Skills. Journal of Language and Literature Studies, 1(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.36312/jolls.v1i1.499
Kerman, N. T., Noroozi, O., Banihashem, S. K., Karami, M., & Biemans, H. J. A. (2022). Online peer feedback patterns of success and failure in argumentative essay writing. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(2)614–626. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2093914
Kushki, A., Rahimi, M., & Davin, K. J. (2022). Dynamic assessment of argumentative writing: Mediating task response. Assessing Writing, 52, 100606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2022.100606
Kusumaningrum, D. R., & Pratiwi, D. (2024). Revealing the Effect: How Google Slides Helps Improve Vocational Students’ Writing Skills. Voices of English Language Education Society, 8(1), 80-92. https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v8i1.24357
Lam, Y. W., Hew, K. F., & Chiu, K. F. (2018). Improving argumentative writing : Effects of a blended learning approach and gamification. Language Learning & Technology, 22(1), 97–118. https://dx.doi.org/10125/44583
Liu, C.-C., Liu, S.-J., Hwang, G.-J., Tu, Y.-F., Wang, Y., & Wang, N. (2023). Engaging EFL students’ critical thinking tendency and in-depth reflection in technology-based writing contexts: A peer assessment-incorporated automatic evaluation approach. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 13027-13052. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11697-6
Lustyantie, N., Suriyati, Y., Isnan, F. N., & Yudha, R. P. (2022). The effect of cognitive style, critical thinking, and digital literature on argumentative writing skills. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 22(1), 27–35. https://jestp.com/menuscript/index.php/estp/article/view/1549
Mehta, S. R., & Al-Mahrooqi, R. (2015). Can thinking be taught? Linking critical thinking and writing in an EFL context. RELC Journal, 46(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688214555356
Murtadho, F. (2021). Metacognitive and critical thinking practices in developing EFL students’ argumentative writing skills. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10(3), 656-666. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v10i3.31752
Nardi, P. M. (2018). Doing survey research: A guide to quantitative methods. Routledge.
Nejmaoui, N. (2019). Improving EFL Learners’ Critical Thinking Skills in Argumentative Writing. English Language Teaching, 12(1), 98–109. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n1p98
mtho, A., & Rahmawati, A. (2020). “Let’S Write a Caption!”: Utilizing Instagram To Enhance Esp Students’ Writing Skills. Jurnal Basis, 7(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.33884/basisupb.v7i1.1782
Nurkamto, J., Prihandoko, L. A., Putro, N. H. P. S., & Purwati, O. (2024). Academic writing apprehension in higher education: A systematic review. Studies in English Language and Education, 11(1), 14–247. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v11i1.28928
Rea, L. M., & Parker, R. A. (2014). Designing and conducting survey research: A comprehensive guide. John Wiley & Sons.
Selvaraj, M., & Aziz, A. A. (2019). Systematic review: Approaches in teaching writing skill in ESL classrooms. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 8(4), 450–473. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v8-i4/6564
Suteja, S., & Setiawan, D. (2022). Students’ critical thinking and writing skills in project-based learning. International Journal of Educational Qualitative Quantitative Research, 1(1), 16–22. https://Doi.Org/10.58418/Ijeqqr.V1i1.5
Teng, M. F., & Yue, M. (2023). Metacognitive writing strategies, critical thinking skills, and academic writing performance: A structural equation modeling approach. Metacognition and Learning, 18(1), 237–260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-022-09328-5
Wambsganss, T., Janson, A., & Leimeister, J. M. (2022). Enhancing argumentative writing with automated feedback and social comparison nudging. Computers & Education, 191, 104644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104644
Wu, Q., Jin, T., Chen, J., & Lei, J. (2023). Peer leadership in collaborative argumentative writing: A qualitative case study of blended design. Journal of Second Language Writing, 60, 100995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2023.100995
Yamin, M., Setiawan, S., & Anam, S. (2023). Enhancing critical thinking to foster students’ analytical capacity in academic writing. International Journal of Language Studies, 17(1), 53-70. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7513369
Yundayani, A., Emzir, E., & Rafli, Z. (2017). Need analysis: The writing skill instructional material context for academic purposes. English Review: Journal of English Education, 6(1), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v6i1.771
Zhang, R., Zou, D., & Cheng, G. (2023). Chatbot-based training on logical fallacy in EFL argumentative writing. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 17(5), 932–945. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2023.2197417
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Arif Nugroho, Nur Hidayanto Pancoro Setyo Putro, Kastam Syamsi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright
Copyright aims to protect the specific way the article has been written to describe an experiment and the results. Journal of Educational Management and Instruction is committed to its authors to protect and defend their work and their reputation and takes allegations of infringement, plagiarism, ethical disputes, and fraud very seriously. Automotive Experiences is published under the terms of the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0). Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication (online and print) with the work simultaneously. We use the restrictive license (non-commercial) as follows:
BY (attribution): Users are allowed to share, distribute and redistribute the published article in any medium or format, with an identification of the authors and its initial publication in this journal. Authors are encouraged to post and distribute their articles immediately after publication (e.g., institutional or public repositories, personal websites). Authors are allowed to enter into additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published and an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
NC (non-commercial): Users are not allowed to use the article commercially without the permission of the authors. Authors agree explicitly that the published article is indexed worldwide in databases, repositories and indexation services, even if these services operate on a commercial basis. Authors grant Journal of Educational Management and Instruction explicit the right to include the published articles in databases, repositories and indexation services.
License
License to Publish
The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0). The author hereby grants Journal of Educational Management and Instruction an exclusive publishing and distribution license in the manuscript include tables, illustrations or other material submitted for publication as part of the manuscript (the “Articleâ€) in print, electronic and all other media (whether now known or later developed), in any form, in all languages, throughout the world, for the full term of copyright, and the right to license others to do the same, effective when the article is accepted for publication. This license includes the right to enforce the rights granted hereunder against third parties.
Author's Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
User Rights
Under the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, the author(s) and users are free to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material). Users must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made.
Rights of Authors
Authors retain the following rights:
- Copyright, and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
- The right to use the substance of the article in future own works, including lectures and books,
- The right to reproduce the article for own purposes, provided the copies are not offered for sale, and
- The right to self-archive the article.
Co-authorship
If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
