Optimizing educational personnel for effective teaching factory implementation in vocational schools: A case study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22515/jemin.v5i1.9548Keywords:
Educational personnel management, industrial collaboration, teaching factory, vocational educationAbstract
There is a growing need to enhance the alignment between vocational education and industry requirements, yet research on the role of educational personnel management in optimizing teaching factory implementation remains limited. This study explores the management of educational personnel in the implementation of teaching factories as an innovative learning model. A teaching factory represents a dynamic and practical learning environment designed to integrate educational processes with industrial practices, bridging the gap between the competencies of students in vocational schools and the demands of industry for skilled workers. The research employs a qualitative approach using a case study method. Data were gathered through observation, participatory observation, documentation, and in-depth interviews with key stakeholders, including the principal, the head of personnel, and the heads of expertise programs. Data analysis involved processes of data condensation, data display, and conclusion drawing. The findings demonstrate that St. Mikael’s approach to educational personnel management is both innovative and effective. By investing in teacher development, fostering collaboration, and addressing challenges proactively, the school has created an environment where both teachers and students thrive. These strategies not only enhance the competencies of educators but also prepare students to meet the demands of the modern workforce. The insights from this study provide valuable lessons for other vocational schools aiming to implement teaching factory models and align education with industry needs.
Downloads
References
Azizah, D. N., Muslim, S., Achmad, R. N., Lukmantoro, D., Farida, U., Ciptono, A., & Joko, J. (2019). Development of teaching factory model at Vocational High School (VHS) in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Learning Education and Counseling, 2(1), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.31960/ijolec.v2i1.115
Chryssolouris, G., Mavrikios, D., & Rentzos, L. (2016). The teaching factory: A manufacturing education paradigm. Procedia Cirp, 57, 44–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.11.009
Conner, J. O. (2022). Applying experiential learning theory to student activism. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 46(9), 1229–1242. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2022.2061843
Djuhartono, T., Ariwibowo, P., & Alhamidi, L. A. (2021). Implementation of total quality management (TQM) on teaching factory (TEFA) vocational middle school in bogor district. Tarbawi: Jurnal Keilmuan Manajemen Pendidikan, 7(02), 269–282. https://doi.org/10.32678/tarbawi.v7i02.4847
Falloon, G. (2019). Using simulations to teach young students science concepts: An Experiential Learning theoretical analysis. Computers & Education, 135, 138–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.03.001
Fattah, F. A., Martono, T., & Sawiji, H. (2021). Implementation and challenges of teaching factory learning at vocational high school. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 8(11), 615–622. http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v8i11.3163
Gumilar, G., & Ridwan, M. (2024). Teaching Factory Model as an Innovative Educational Approach to Enhance Competence Development in Hospitality: A Case Study at de Balen Soultan Hotel. EduLine: Journal of Education and Learning Innovation, 4(4), 537–548. https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.eduline3170
Gustiar, R., Kurniawati, K., & Winarsih, M. (2021). The challenges of teaching Indonesian history in the teaching factory learning model in vocational high school. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 13(2), 971–978. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v13i2.692
Hatmojo, Y. I., & Ikhsannudin, W. (2024). Development of Teaching Factory Learning Model in Industrial Automation in Vocational High Schools. Jurnal Edukasi Elektro, 8(1), 55–64. https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jee/article/view/68772/21425
Hidayati, L., & Mayasari, P. (2020). Analysis of the effectiveness of the teaching factory implementation in preparing work competence in Era 4.0. 2nd International Conference on Social, Applied Science, and Technology in Home Economics (ICONHOMECS 2019), 85–90. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200218.014
Huberman, M., & Miles, M. B. (2002). The qualitative researcher’s companion. Sage Publication.
Imran, I., Marji, M., Suswanto, H., & Adhikari, B. P. (2024). The influence of Teaching Factory (TEFA) implementation and work readiness on vocational high school students’ future job perspectives. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 14(1), 86–96. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v14i1.66796
Islami, F., Witono, A. H., & Hakim, M. (2021). Teaching Factory-Based Learning Management in-State Vocational High School 4 Mataram. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 8(7), 479–488. http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v8i7.2793
Kautsar, A., Wiyono, G., Mulia, M., Iqbal, M., & Al-Fairusy, M. (2022). Teaching factory model development in vocational high schools. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(4), 6347–6360. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i4.2461
Kovalchuk, V., Maslich, S. V, Tkachenko, N., Shevchuk, S. S., & Shchypska, T. P. (2022). Vocational education in the context of modern problems and challenges. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 8(11), 329–338. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v11n8p329
Kua, J., Lim, W.-S., Teo, W., & Edwards, R. A. (2021). A scoping review of adaptive expertise in education. Medical Teacher, 43(3), 347–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1851020
Legge, K. (2014). Human resource management: a critical analysis. In New Perspectives on Human Resource Management (Routledge Revivals) (pp. 19–40). Routledge.
Lichtman, M. (2023). Qualitative research in education: A user’s guide. Routledge.
Mahlangu, S., & Mtshali, T. (2024). A deflating quality TVET education in Gauteng Technical, Vocational Education and Training Colleges. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), 13(3), 441–447. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v13i3.3224
Martawijaya, D. H. (2012). Developing a teaching factory learning model to improve production competencies among mechanical engineering students in a vocational senior high school. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 4(2), 45-56. https://publisher.uthm.edu.my/ojs/index.php/JTET/article/view/637
Mavrikios, D., Georgoulias, K., & Chryssolouris, G. (2018). The teaching factory paradigm: Developments and outlook. Procedia Manufacturing, 23, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.04.029
McGrath, S., & Ramsarup, P. (2024). Towards vocational education and training and skills development for sustainable futures. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 76(2), 247–258). https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2024.2317574
Morris, T. H. (2020). Experiential learning–a systematic review and revision of Kolb’s model. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(8), 1064–1077. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1570279
Mourtzis, D., Panopoulos, N., & Angelopoulos, J. (2023). A hybrid teaching factory model towards personalized education 4.0. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 36(12), 1739–1759. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2022.2145025
Mourtzis, D., Panopoulos, N., Angelopoulos, J., Zygomalas, S., Dimitrakopoulos, G., & Stavropoulos, P. (2021). A hybrid teaching factory model for supporting the educational process in COVID-19 era. Procedia Cirp, 104, 1626–1631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2021.11.274
Moyson, S., Raaphorst, N., Groeneveld, S., & Van de Walle, S. (2018). Organizational socialization in public administration research: A systematic review and directions for future research. The American Review of Public Administration, 48(6), 610–627. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074017696160
Puspita, D. A., Muchlas, M., & Kuat, T. (2020). The implementation of teaching factory to improve student interest in entrepreneurship at multimedia competencies. Journal of Technology and Humanities, 1(2), 42–50. https://doi.org/10.53797/jthkkss.v1i2.5.2020
Qutni, D., Kristiawan, M., & Fitriani, Y. (2021). Human resource management in improving the quality of education. Edunesia: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 2(2), 354–366. https://doi.org/10.51276/edu.v2i2.132
Ravichandran, R. R., & Mahapatra, J. (2023). Virtual reality in vocational education and training: challenges and possibilities. Journal of Digital Learning and Education, 3(1), 25–31. https://doi.org/10.52562/jdle.v3i1.602
Rohaeni, E., Trisnamansyah, S., Wasliman, I., & Sauri, S. (2021). Implementation of teaching factory in improving the competence of vocational high school students (SMK). Journal of Social Science, 2(5), 598–609. https://doi.org/10.46799/jss.v2i5.220
Rustomo, R., Makruf, I., Fahroni, R. L., & Giyoto, G. (2024). Teacher commitment and learning quality: Encouraging teaching factory at Bekasi Islamic Private Vocational School. Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian Dan Kajian Kepustakaan Di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran, 10(3), 1205–1218. https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v10i3.12683
Schuler, R., & E. Jackson, S. (2014). Human resource management and organizational effectiveness: yesterday and today. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 1(1), 35–55. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOEPP-01-2014-0003
Suhartini, R. (2022). Teaching Factory Management in Vocational High Schools. Ilomata International Journal of Management, 3(2), 194–202. https://doi.org/10.52728/ijjm.v3i2.448
Sutianah, C., Sobandi, B., Yamin, A. A., & Trang, P. D. K. (2024). Increasing creativity, production innovation and commercialization through the new teaching factory model based on life skills. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 14(2), 133-146. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v14i2.67400
Tan, C., & Ng, C. S. L. (2021). Constructivism in education. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education.
Wahjusaputri, S., Nastiti, T. I., Bunyamin, B., Sukmawati, W., & Johan, J. (2024). Development of Teaching Factory Model-Based Artificial Intelligence: Improving the Quality of Learning Vocational Schools in Indonesia. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 16(4), 5173-5183. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v16i4.5979
Ye, J.-H., He, Z., Bai, B., & Wu, Y.-F. (2024). Sustainability of Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) along with Vocational Psychology. Behavioral Sciences, 14(10), 859. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14100859
Yin, R. K. (2015). Qualitative research from start to finish. Guilford publications.
Downloads
Submitted
Accepted
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Alexius Dwi Widiatna, Natalis Suka Permana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright
Copyright aims to protect the specific way the article has been written to describe an experiment and the results. Journal of Educational Management and Instruction is committed to its authors to protect and defend their work and their reputation and takes allegations of infringement, plagiarism, ethical disputes, and fraud very seriously. Automotive Experiences is published under the terms of the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0). Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication (online and print) with the work simultaneously. We use the restrictive license (non-commercial) as follows:
BY (attribution): Users are allowed to share, distribute and redistribute the published article in any medium or format, with an identification of the authors and its initial publication in this journal. Authors are encouraged to post and distribute their articles immediately after publication (e.g., institutional or public repositories, personal websites). Authors are allowed to enter into additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published and an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
NC (non-commercial): Users are not allowed to use the article commercially without the permission of the authors. Authors agree explicitly that the published article is indexed worldwide in databases, repositories and indexation services, even if these services operate on a commercial basis. Authors grant Journal of Educational Management and Instruction explicit the right to include the published articles in databases, repositories and indexation services.
License
License to Publish
The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0). The author hereby grants Journal of Educational Management and Instruction an exclusive publishing and distribution license in the manuscript include tables, illustrations or other material submitted for publication as part of the manuscript (the “Articleâ€) in print, electronic and all other media (whether now known or later developed), in any form, in all languages, throughout the world, for the full term of copyright, and the right to license others to do the same, effective when the article is accepted for publication. This license includes the right to enforce the rights granted hereunder against third parties.
Author's Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
User Rights
Under the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, the author(s) and users are free to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material). Users must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made.
Rights of Authors
Authors retain the following rights:
- Copyright, and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
- The right to use the substance of the article in future own works, including lectures and books,
- The right to reproduce the article for own purposes, provided the copies are not offered for sale, and
- The right to self-archive the article.
Co-authorship
If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
