Examining technology readiness among senior high school teachers: The role of proactive school management
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22515/jemin.v4i2.9729Keywords:
Proactive School Management, Senior High School Teachers, Technology ReadinessAbstract
Teachers play a pivotal role in integrating technology into education. Proactive school management can significantly enhance teachers' ability to utilize technology, making the teaching and learning process more creative, modern, and aligned with contemporary developments. This study investigates the relationship between teachers' technology usage and their technology readiness, which refers to an individual's propensity to accept and use new technologies for daily needs. A non-experimental quantitative research design with a descriptive method was employed. Data collection was conducted through an online questionnaire distributed to 100 senior high school teachers in Bandung City, Indonesia. The sampling technique used was non-probability sampling, specifically snowball sampling. The instrument utilized in this study was the Technology Readiness Index, which has a high reliability score. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, normality tests, and the Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests. The findings revealed that 52% of respondents fell into the high technology readiness category, indicating that proactive school management supports teachers in being more inclined to accept and use new technologies effectively. The study highlights the importance of school leadership in fostering a positive technological environment, with implications for future teacher training programs.
Downloads
References
Aini, Q., Manongga, D., Rahardja, U., Sembiring, I., & Li, Y. M. (2024). Understanding Behavioral Intention to Use of Air Quality Monitoring Solutions with Emphasis on Technology Readiness. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2357860
Alasmari, N. J., & Althaqafi, A. S. A. (2021). Teachers’ practices of proactive and reactive classroom management strategies and the relationship to their self-efficacy. Language Teaching Research, 13621688211046351. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211046351
Ateş, H., Garzón, J., & Lampropoulos, G. (2023). Evaluating science teachers’ flipped learning readiness: a GETAMEL approach test. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2255232
Azaola, M. C. (2021). Social fragmentation and the public–private school divide: the case of high-achieving high schools in Mexico City. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 19(5), 672–686. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2021.1878011
Badiozaman, I. F. A. (2021). Exploring online readiness in the context of the COVID 19 pandemic. Teaching in Higher Education, 28(8), 1974–1992. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1943654
Bentsi-Enchill, F. (2024). Teachers’ role and factors hindering Ghanaian high school students’ academic performance using Walberg’s educational productivity. Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2393924
Blut, M., & Wang, C. (2020). Technology readiness: a meta-analysis of conceptualizations of the construct and its impact on technology usage. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48, 649-669. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00680-8
Chu, W. W., Ong, E. T., Ayop, S. K., Mohd Azmi, M. S., Abdullah, A. S., Abd Karim, N. S., & Tho, S. W. (2021). The innovative use of smartphone for sound STEM practical kit: a pilot implementation for secondary classroom. Research in Science & Technological Education, 41(3), 1008–1030. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2021.1978963
Collado, Z. C., Pantaleta, F. O., Landagan, M. D., Rescober, A. A. S., Baral, G. D., Villareal, M. G. B., … Cortez, C. P. (2024). Switching to virtual classes: exploring teacher readiness under the ‘new normal.’ Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 33(2), 187–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2024.2305341
Fathurrohman, M., Nindiasari, H., Anriani, N., Pamungkas, A. S., & Koo, A. C. (2021). Empowering mathematics teachers’ ICT readiness with android applications for Bring Your Own Devices (BYOD) practice in education. Cogent Education, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.2002131
Hasyim, N., Arismunandar, Butarbutar, R., Ramli, A. M., & Malik Nur, I. D. (2024). Mind mapping of teachers’ readiness for online teaching and learning: A reflective study of urban and suburban areas. Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2292864
Howard, S. K., Tondeur, J., Siddiq, F., & Scherer, R. (2020). Ready, set, go! Profiling teachers’ readiness for online teaching in secondary education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 30(1), 141–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2020.1839543
Kassa, E. A., & Mekonnen, E. A. (2022). Computational thinking in the Ethiopian secondary school ICT curriculum. Computer Science Education, 32(4), 502–531. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2022.2095594
Karaseva, A., Pruulmann-Vengerfeldt, P., & Siibak, A. (2017). Relationships between in-service teacher achievement motivation and use of educational technology: case study with Latvian and Estonian teachers. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 27(1), 33–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2017.1339633
Leacock, C. J., & Warrican, S. J. (2020). Helping teachers to respond to COVID-19 in the Eastern Caribbean: issues of readiness, equity and care. Journal of Education for Teaching, 46(4), 576–585. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2020.1803733
Luo, Y., & Watts, M. (2023). Teachers’ Readiness to Adopt Smartphone-Based Teaching Methods: Evidence from China. Computers in the Schools, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2023.2244493
Luo, S., & Zou, D. (2023). K-12 teacher readiness for flipped foreign language teaching: scale development and validation. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2023.2196459
Mohamed, Z., Valcke, M., & De Wever, B. (2016). Are they ready to teach? Student teachers’ readiness for the job with reference to teacher competence frameworks. Journal of Education for Teaching, 43(2), 151–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2016.1257509
Mpuangnan, K. N. (2024). Teacher preparedness and professional development needs for successful technology integration in teacher education. Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2408837
Nzabahimana, J., Ndihokubwayo, K., & Mugabo, L. R. (2024). Teachers’ Experiences with the Use of Virtual Laboratories in the Teaching of Physics in Rwandan Secondary Schools: A Survey Design. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/18117295.2024.2361546
Olechowski, A. L., Eppinger, S. D., Joglekar, N., & Tomaschek, K. (2020). Technology readiness levels: Shortcomings and improvement opportunities. Systems Engineering, 23(4), 395-408. https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.21533
Okhremtchouk, I. S., & Sellu, G. S. (2019). Teacher readiness to work with english language learners: Arizona context. The Teacher Educator, 54(2), 125–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/08878730.2018.1533058
Paramita, P. P., Sharma, U., Anderson, A., & Laletas, S. (2021). Factors influencing Indonesian teachers’ use of proactive classroom management strategies. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 28(1), 38–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2021.1916107
Petko, D., Prasse, D., & Cantieni, A. (2018). The Interplay of School Readiness and Teacher Readiness for Educational Technology Integration: A Structural Equation Model. Computers in the Schools, 35(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2018.1428007
Polly, D., Martin, F., & Byker, E. (2022). Examining Pre-Service and In-Service Teachers’ Perceptions of Their Readiness to Use Digital Technologies for Teaching and Learning. Computers in the Schools, 40(1), 22–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2022.2121107
Rafiee, M., & Abbasian-Naghneh, S. (2019). E-learning: development of a model to assess the acceptance and readiness of technology among language learners. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(5–6), 730–750. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1640255
Ren, X., & Zhou, Y. (2022). Chinese Undergraduate Students’ Learning Experiences in a Transnational Distance Education Program in the United States. American Journal of Distance Education, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2022.2119019
Rojas-Mendez, J. I., Parasuraman, A., & Papadopoulos, N. (2017). Demographics, attitudes, and technology readiness: A cross-cultural analysis and model validation. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 35(1), 18-39. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-08-2015-0163
Rowe, E., & Perry, L. B. (2019). Inequalities in the private funding of public schools: parent financial contributions and school socioeconomic status. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 52(1), 42–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2019.1689234
Rushton, E. A. C., Murtagh, L., Ball-Smith, C., Black, B., Dunlop, L., Gibbons, S., … Scott, C. (2022). Reflecting on ’classroom readiness’ in initial teacher education in a time of global pandemic from the perspectives of eight university providers from across England, UK. Journal of Education for Teaching, 49(4), 551–568. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2022.2150840
Sun, S., Lee, P., Lee, A., & Law, R. (2016). Perception of Attributes and Readiness for Educational Technology: Hospitality Management Students’ Perspectives. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education, 28(3), 142–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/10963758.2016.1189832
Warden, C. A., Yi-Shun, W., Stanworth, J. O., & Chen, J. F. (2020). Millennials’ technology readiness and self-efficacy in online classes. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 59(2), 226–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2020.1798269
Wibowo, D. (2021). The role of school culture in teacher professional development for peace education: the case of Sukma Bangsa School Pidie in post-conflict Aceh, Indonesia. Journal of Peace Education, 19(2), 182–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/17400201.2021.2015573
Downloads
Submitted
Accepted
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Anissa Lestari Kadiyono, Admiranti Adhyarizka Wardhani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright
Copyright aims to protect the specific way the article has been written to describe an experiment and the results. Journal of Educational Management and Instruction is committed to its authors to protect and defend their work and their reputation and takes allegations of infringement, plagiarism, ethical disputes, and fraud very seriously. Automotive Experiences is published under the terms of the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0). Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication (online and print) with the work simultaneously. We use the restrictive license (non-commercial) as follows:
BY (attribution): Users are allowed to share, distribute and redistribute the published article in any medium or format, with an identification of the authors and its initial publication in this journal. Authors are encouraged to post and distribute their articles immediately after publication (e.g., institutional or public repositories, personal websites). Authors are allowed to enter into additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published and an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
NC (non-commercial): Users are not allowed to use the article commercially without the permission of the authors. Authors agree explicitly that the published article is indexed worldwide in databases, repositories and indexation services, even if these services operate on a commercial basis. Authors grant Journal of Educational Management and Instruction explicit the right to include the published articles in databases, repositories and indexation services.
License
License to Publish
The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0). The author hereby grants Journal of Educational Management and Instruction an exclusive publishing and distribution license in the manuscript include tables, illustrations or other material submitted for publication as part of the manuscript (the “Articleâ€) in print, electronic and all other media (whether now known or later developed), in any form, in all languages, throughout the world, for the full term of copyright, and the right to license others to do the same, effective when the article is accepted for publication. This license includes the right to enforce the rights granted hereunder against third parties.
Author's Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
User Rights
Under the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, the author(s) and users are free to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material). Users must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made.
Rights of Authors
Authors retain the following rights:
- Copyright, and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
- The right to use the substance of the article in future own works, including lectures and books,
- The right to reproduce the article for own purposes, provided the copies are not offered for sale, and
- The right to self-archive the article.
Co-authorship
If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.